Table 2 Extended QFD for MEC modules planning
From: Personalization for Massive Product Innovation Using Open Architecture
CRs | FNs | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Container for bulk loads | Platform for packed boxes | Handle bar steering | Steering wheel | Foot acceleration | Foot brake | House electric charge | Public electric charge | Spring support to reduce road impact | Prevent wind | Prevent rain | Car body | Car chassis | Car frame | Car seat | CRs weight | Expected change | |
Carry different loads | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
Easy control | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Use electric power | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 |
Run on different roads | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 |
Use in different weather conditions | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Safety | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
Driver comfort | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 |
VC | 31 | 31 | 22 | 22 | 13 | 13 | 14 | 14 | 19 | 35 | 35 | 22 | 22 | 19 | 21 | ||
TIW | 53 | 53 | 65 | 65 | 44 | 44 | 56 | 56 | 40 | 59 | 59 | 45 | 45 | 50 | 45 | ||
rTIW (%) | 6.8 | 6.8 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 5.6 | 5.6 | 7.2 | 7.2 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.6 | 5.8 | 5.8 | 6.4 | 5.8 | ||
wCOV | 2.11 | 2.11 | 1.84 | 1.84 | 0.73 | 0.73 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 2.65 | 2.65 | 1.27 | 1.27 | 1.22 | 1.21 | ||
DV (%) | 79.59 | 79.59 | 69.27 | 69.27 | 27.71 | 27.71 | 37.98 | 37.98 | 36.82 | 100 | 100 | 47.96 | 47.96 | 46.02 | 45.78 | ||
Module type | Vp | Vp | Vc | Vc | C | C | C | C | C | Vp | Vp | C | C | C | C | ||