Table 5 Mann–Whitney U test results are listed to compare the MLMs in terms of slipper parameters
Comparison | Leakage | Oil film thick. | Pocket press. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LR | Z | − 6.653 | − 6.653 | − 6.653 |
vs. | Mean Diff. | 5.730 × 10−3 | 2.716 × 10−1 | 2.439 × 10−1 |
DNN | p-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Sig. (p < 0.05) | DNN | DNN | DNN | |
DT | Z | − 2.957 | − 6.653 | − 5.751 |
vs. | Mean Diff. | 5.230 × 10−4 | 3.291 × 10−1 | 8.965 × 10−2 |
DNN | p-value | 0.003 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Sig. (p < 0.05) | DNN | DNN | DNN | |
SVM | Z | − 6.653 | − 6.653 | − 4.746 |
vs. | Mean Diff. | 1.484 × 10−3 | 2.374 × 10−1 | 8.465 × 10−2 |
DNN | p-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Sig. (p < 0.05) | DNN | DNN | DNN | |
NN | Z | − 4.613 | − 5.131 | − 4.539 |
vs. | Mean Diff. | 6.511 × 10−4 | 1.807 × 10−2 | 6.496 × 10−2 |
DNN | p-value | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Sig. (p < 0.05) | DNN | DNN | DNN | |