Integrated Production and Transportation Scheduling Method in Hybrid Flow Shop

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Table 16 Comparison about average makespan on Group 1 with small-size and small-α

Job	Stage	AGV	α	GA	SA	ABC	GWO	MBO	GATS
10	5	2	0.10	435	433	425	428	422	426
		4		434	428	425	424	425	423
		6		431	427	424	424	424	423
	10	2	0.14	854	848	844	851	837	833
		4		845	844	841	843	838	835
		6		843	840	835	844	833	839
20	5	2	0.10	707	711	714	736	688	694
		4		698	705	700	711	686	685
		6		698	698	702	712	686	685
	10	2	0.17	1007	1009	1011	1017	961	991
		4		892	893	885	906	876	861
		6		885	881	889	897	855	855
30	5	2	0.11	758	752	775	772	733	731
		4		729	730	743	738	711	700
		6		724	728	737	736	707	699
	10	2	0.16	1510	1519	1529	1536	1464	1531
		4		1197	1201	1212	1211	1173	1167
		6		1176	1171	1188	1185	1144	1123
Number of optimal solutions				1	0	0	0	6	13