Skip to main content
  • Published:

Multi-segment and multi-ply overlapping process of multi coupled activities based on valid information evolution

Abstract

Complex product development will inevitably face the design planning of the multi-coupled activities, and overlapping these activities could potentially reduce product development time, but there is a risk of the additional cost. Although the downstream task information dependence to the upstream task is already considered in the current researches, but the design process overall iteration caused by the information interdependence between activities is hardly discussed; especially the impact on the design process’ overall iteration from the valid information accumulation process. Secondly, most studies only focus on the single overlapping process of two activities, rarely take multi-segment and multi-ply overlapping process of multi coupled activities into account; especially the inherent link between product development time and cost which originates from the overlapping process of multi coupled activities. For the purpose of solving the above problems, as to the insufficiency of the accumulated valid information in overlapping process, the function of the valid information evolution (VIE) degree is constructed. Stochastic process theory is used to describe the design information exchange and the valid information accumulation in the overlapping segment, and then the planning models of the single overlapping segment are built. On these bases, by analyzing overlapping processes and overlapping features of multi-coupling activities, multi-segment and multi-ply overlapping planning models are built; by sorting overlapping processes and analyzing the construction of these planning models, two conclusions are obtained: (1) As to multi-segment and multi-ply overlapping of multi coupled activities, the total decrement of the task set development time is the sum of the time decrement caused by basic overlapping segments, and minus the sum of the time increment caused by multiple overlapping segments; (2) the total increment of development cost is the sum of the cost increment caused by all overlapping process. And then, based on overlapping degree analysis of these planning models, by the VIE degree function, the four lemmas theory proofs are represented, and two propositions are finally proved: (1) The multi-ply overlapping of the multi coupled activities will weaken the basic overlapping effect on the development cycle time reduction (2) Overlapping the multi coupled activities will decrease product development cycle, but increase product development cost. And there is trade-off between development time and cost. And so, two methods are given to slacken and eliminate multi-ply overlapping effects. At last, an example about a vehicle upper subsystem design illustrates the application of the proposed models; compared with a sequential execution pattern, the decreasing of development cycle (22%) and the increasing of development cost (3%) show the validity of the method in the example. The proposed research not only lays a theoretical foundation for correctly planning complex product development process, but also provides specific and effective operation methods for overlapping multi coupled activities.

References

  1. UNGER D W, EPPINGER S D. Planning design iterations [EB/OL]. Appears in Innovation in Manufacturing System and Technology. Issue Date: Jan-2002. http://dspace.mit.edu//retrive/4089/IMST016.pdf.

  2. KRISHNAN V, ULRICH K T. Product development decisions: A review of the literature[J]. Management Science, 2001, 47(1): 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. CHAKRAVARTH A K. Overlapping design and build cycles in product development[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2001, 134: 392–424.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. HA A Y, PORTEUS E L. Optimal timing of reviews in concurrent design for manufacturability[J]. Management Science, 1995, 41(9): 1 431–1 447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Loch C H, TERWIESCH C. Communication and uncertainty in concurrent engineering[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(8): 1 032–1 048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. KRISHNAN V, EPPINGER S D, WHITNEY D E. A model-based framework to overlap product development activities[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(4): 437–451.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. YASSINE A A, CHELST K R, FALKENBURG D R. A decision analytic framework for evaluating concurrent engineering[J]. IEEE Transaction on Engineering Management, 1999, 46(2): 144–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WANG Zhiliang, ZHANG Youliang. Research on overlapping of coupled activities[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2006, 6(12): 947–954. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  9. FARID A, JOHNSOM E, WILL P. Is concurrent engineering always a sensible proposition?[J]. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1995, 42(2): 166–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. SMITH R P, EPPINGER S D. Deciding between sequential and parallel tasks in engineering design” concurrent engineering[J]. Research and Applications, 1998, 6(1): 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  11. KRISHNAN V, EPPINGER S D. WHITNEY, D E. Accelerating product development by the exchange of preliminary product design information[J]. Journal of Mechanical Design, 1995, 117(12): 491–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WANG Zheng, YAN Hongsen. Concurrency optimization in product development process[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2002, 11(8): 852–857. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. CARRASCOSA M, EPPINGER S D, WHINEY D E. Using the design structure matrix to estimate product development time[C]//Proceeding of DETC’98, 1998 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, September 13–16, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 1998: 1–10.

  14. BLACUD N A, BOGUS S M, DIEKMANN J E, et al. Sensitivity of construction activities under design uncertainty[J]. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 2009, 135(3): 199–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. WANG Juite, LIN Yung-I. An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development[J]. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 2009, 57(2): 460–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. XU Duo, YAN Hongsen. Time model and optimization method in concurrent product development process[J]. Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2006, 42(1): 23–29, 34. (inChinese)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. XU Ci-jun, LI Ai-ping, LIU Xue-mei. Time model in overlapped development process of coupled activities[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2009, 10(15): 1 914–1 920. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  18. ROEMER T A, AHMADI R. Concurrent crashing and overlapping in product development[J]. Operations Research, 2004, 52(4): 606–622

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. ROEMER T A, AHMADI R, WANG R H. Time-cost trade-offs in overlapped product development[J]. Operations Research, 2000, 48(6): 858–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. KRISHNAN V, EPPINGER S D, WHITNEY D E. Iterative overlapping: accelerating product development by preliminary information exchange[C]//Proceeding of ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, New York, NY (USA), 1993: 223–231.

  21. ZANGWILL W I, KANTOR P B. Toward a theory of continuous improvement and the learning curve[J]. Management Science, 1998, 44(7): 910–920.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. HE Yuchen, WANG Xiankui, LIU Chengying, et al. Two application modes for concurrency of concurrent engineering[J]. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2002, 7(8): 538–541. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  23. SMITH R P, EPPINGER S D. A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design[J]. Management Science, 1997, 43(8): 1 104–1 120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. WANG Zhiliang, WANG Yunxia, LU Yun. Primary exploration of optimization theory and method for ordering coupled tasks[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2011, 22(12): 1 444–1 449. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. WANG Zhiliang, WANG Yunxia, MA Yinzhong. Research on coupled tasks’ sequence optimization based on qualitative and quantitative partial order[J]. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2012, 121-126: 4 601–4 605.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiliang Wang.

Additional information

This project is sponsored by Jiangsu Provincial Colleges and Universities Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 08KJD410001), Humanities and Social Sciences Planning Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 12YJAZH151), and Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Fund of Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 12YJCZH209)

WANG Zhiliang, born in 1965, is currently an associate professor at Nanjing Institute of Technology, China. He received his PhD degree from Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China, in 2005. His main research interests include decision-making, manufacturing Automation, industrial engineering.

WANG Yunxia, born in 1976, is currently an associate professor at Nanjing Institute of Technology, China. She received her PhD degree from Southeast University, China, in 2005. His main research interests include advanced manufacturing, numerical control, industrial engineering.

QIU Shenghai, born in 1967, is currently an associate professor at Nanjing Institute of Technology, China. He is currently a PhD candidate at Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, China. His research interests include advanced manufacturing, management information system, and industrial engineering.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wang, Z., Wang, Y. & Qiu, S. Multi-segment and multi-ply overlapping process of multi coupled activities based on valid information evolution. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 26, 176–188 (2013). https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2013.01.176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3901/CJME.2013.01.176

Key words