Integrated Production and Transportation Scheduling Method in Hybrid Flow Shop

Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering

Table 8 Comparison on Group 1 with small-size and small-α

Job	Stage	AGV	α	GATS_FCFS		GATS_LTBA		GATS_STD		GATS_GWTQ
Job	Stage	AGV	α	Best	Average	Best	Average	Best	Average	Best	Average
10	5	2	0.10	424	426	423	427	456	467	423	424
		4		423	423	422	422	441	455	423	423
		6		423	423	423	423	433	442	423	423
	10	2	0.14	830	833	842	844	948	996	830	845
		4		830	835	830	833	926	967	830	840
		6		830	839	830	830	859	888	830	834
20	5	2	0.10	687	694	689	698	820	837	686	696
		4		681	685	677	682	779	799	675	681
		6		679	685	678	682	780	795	679	682
	10	2	0.17	974	991	1024	1038	1166	1190	975	992
		4		860	861	861	869	1074	1093	851	859
		6		842	855	842	854	1046	1102	848	855
30	5	2	0.11	720	731	729	741	900	918	721	740
		4		696	700	708	709	831	856	697	705
		6		686	699	694	702	838	849	692	702
	10	2	0.16	1485	1531	1590	1603	1500	1602	1510	1532
		4		1161	1167	1155	1187	1448	1486	1135	1154
		6		1115	1123	1132	1144	1385	1395	1111	1127
Number of optimal solutions				10	9	7	6	0	0	10	6