Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of the results obtained by GA and IPM

From: A Shakedown Strength Based Parametric Optimization Technique and Its Application on an Airtight Module

−

Number of function evaluations

Results

\(L_{1}\)(mm)

\(L_{2}\)(mm)

\(\alpha\)

Relative error (%)

GA

1094

50.00

43.50

1.78

0.50

IPM

290

49.99

48.84

1.79

0.14

Expectation

−

50.00

50.00

1.79

−