From: A Review of Nano/Micro/Milli Needles Fabrications for Biomedical Engineering
Methods | Fabrication illustrations | SEM images | Materials | Advantages | Typical limitations | Typical applications |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bottom-up | ||||||
Chemical vapor deposition | Solid nanoneedles
| Silicon, Carbon, GaN | High efficiency, high repeatability | Expensive equipment, high production cost | Cell sensing, cell drug delivery | |
Atom layer deposition | Hollow nanoneedles
| Ni Al2O3 | High machining accuracy, high aspect ratio, fit for hollow nanoneedle | Expensive equipment, multiple steps, low efficiency | Gene delivery, protein extraction | |
Top-down | ||||||
Metal-assisted chemical etch | Porous nanoneedles
| Silicon | High efficiency, simple process, low cost, fit for mass production | Random distribution, wide dimension | Cell drug delivery, cell sensing | |
Reactive ion etch | Hollow nanoneedles
| Silicon SiO2/Si | High machining accuracy, highly ordered, better controllability | Expensive equipment, high resolution mask, low flexible | Cell drug delivery | |
Focused ion beam | Hollow nanoneedles | Silicon | Good flexibility, high aspect ratio, fine controllability, fit for hollow nanoneedle | Expensive equipment, low efficiency | Cell drug delivery, cell sensing | |
Nanoimprinting | Solid nanoneedles | Aluminum | High resolution, low cost, high consistency, fit for mass production | Multiple steps, low flexible, high precision mold | Biosensing |