Table 1 Summary of reported strong magnetic field effects on morphology and amount of produced phase
From: Effects of Electric and Magnetic Treatments on Microstructures of Solid Metals: A Review
Materials | Magnetic flux density (T) | Produced phase | Differences of volume fraction | Refs. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TC4 titanium alloy | 4 | α phase | Increase by 20% | [87] |
Cu–72 wt% Ag alloy | 12 | Lamellar Cu | Decrease by 1.4% | [88] |
Ni42Co8Mn39Sn11 alloy | 12 | Martensitic | Increase by 0.45% | [89] |
Fe-1.1%C alloy | 12 | Secondary cementite | Increase from 0.62% to 1.54% | [90] |
Al–4.8%Cu alloy | 11.5 | θ phase | Decrease from 6.8% to5.2% | [91] |
Fe-0.5C3.6Ni1.5Cr alloy | 10 | Bainitic | Increase from 8% to 97% | [92] |
7085 aluminum alloy | 12 | T and S phase | Significantly decreases | [93] |
Fe-0.44C0.23Si1.2Mn alloy | 10 | Ferrite | Increase by 10% | [94] |
Alnico alloys | 10 | Ferromagnetic particles | Significantly increases | [95] |