Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of different modeling methods

From: Development of Fixture Layout Optimization for Thin-Walled Parts: A Review

 

Methods

Scope of application

Advantages

Limitations

References

Mechanism-based modeling methods

Jacobian matrix method

Single-station process

Robust design

Rigid assumption

Simple calculation

Direct reflect the influence of fixture deviations on part variations

Applicable to rigid assumptions

Limited for complex problems

Cai et al. [25], Cai [5], Xing et al. [26] and Lu et al. [27]

State space method

Multi-station process

Variation propagation

Considering source variations

Suitable for multi-station assembly

Considering various source variations

Cannot be used for complex problems

Complicated derivation and calculation

Masoumi et al. [10], Kim and Ding [11], Tian et al. [13], Huang et al. [14], Xie et al. [15], Jin and Shi [30], Ding et al. [31], Zhang and Shi [32, 33], Chaipradabgiat et al. [34], Tyagi et al. [35]

FEM

Considering deformations caused by force

Compliant assumption

Intuitively reflect the deformations at nodes

Easy to understand its principle

Large amount of calculation

Calculation accuracy depends on FEA software

Du et al. [23], Haynes and Lee [36], DeVries and Menassa [37], Zhong and Hu [38], Chen et al. [39], Liao et al. [40], Vishnupriyan et al. [41], Kumar and Paulraj [42], Wu et al. [43], Hajimiri et al. [44], Xiong et al. [45], Yang et al. [46], Dou et al. [47], Wen et al. [48], Wu et al. [49], Liu and Hu [50], Aderiani et al. [51], Sayeed et al. [52, 53]

Data-based modeling methods

Regression modeling methods

RSM

Large amount of calculation

Multiple input variables

Simple calculation

Reduce the amount of calculation

Require a small amount of data

Model accuracy depends on data and parameters

Requirements for experimental design and data sampling

Time for parameter optimization

Sundararaman et al. [54, 57], Li et al. [55, 56], Xia et al. [58], Yu et al. [59]

SVR

Good generalization ability

Su et al. [61], Yang et al. [62]

Kriging

Stable accuracy

Yang et al. [65], Yue et al. [66]

PLSR

Suitable for multiple outputs

Bi et al. [19]

Grey model

Low requirements for data

Yang et al. [69]

ANN methods

BPNN

Large amount of calculation

Multiple input variables

Relatively simple structure

Reflecting the complex relationship between inputs and outputs

More accurate

Need a large amount of data

Not interpretable

Long time to obtain the model

Selvakumar et al. [70], Rex and Ravindran [71], Qin et al. [72, 73], Ramachandran et al. [74]

RBFNN

Fast convergence

Global approximation

Wang et al. [75, 76], Ma et al. [77]