Table 5 Comparison of the optimization results of the upper beam obtained by the proposed and previous algorithms
Algorithm | Optimal solution (h1, h2, l1, l2, l3) mm | Mechanical performance indices of the upper beam | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
[wL, wR] kg | [δL, δR] MPa | [dL, dR] mm, \(\left\langle {d^{C} ,d^{W} } \right\rangle \;{\text{mm}}\) | ||
Proposed | (238.89,280.22,81.61,32.73,386.21) | [4983.9, 5000.0] | [40.16, 44.95] | [0.1834, 0.2220], \(\left\langle {0.2027,\;0.0193} \right\rangle\) |
Previous | (248.03,296.28,85.31,30.31,387.89) | [4992.3, 5008.9] | [38.64, 43.56] | [0.1976, 0.2366], \(\left\langle {0.2171,\;0.0195} \right\rangle\) |