Design for AM guideline | Decisions |
---|---|
Support structures, cavities and overhangs | To reduce the use of support structures and avoid cavities and overhangs, parts were orientated as shown in Figure 8. According to these part orientations, none support structures were needed |
Part size | Since the dimensions of each part were smaller than the system workspace, part size problems were not envisaged and each part was fabricated separately |
Thin sections | To reduce the production time and increase the structural strength of the part, a 0.5Â mm layer thickness was selected |
Geometrical features | Small holes of the cap-end heads were orientated vertically |
Part orientation | To reduce the use of support structures, and to guarantee the stability of the parts during construction, parts were orientated as shown in Figure 8 |
Path planning Distortion, shrinkage & warping Accuracy | To increase the accuracy of the components and avoid distortion or warping, a closed and alternating filling pattern was used in all parts |
Stability and post-processing | All parts were orientated with the largest flat area matching the build platform to ensure stability during fabrication, Figure 8. Post-processing work was considered to improve the surface finish and eliminate the staircase effect |
Design with materials | The ABS was selected as the part material because it will not be under mechanical loads. The PLA was selected as the support material |
Part cost | To reduce the use of support structures and material, the parts were orientated as shown in Figure 8 |