A Review on Ultrasonic-Assisted Forming: Mechanism, Model, and Process

Abstract

Compared with conventional forming processes, ultrasonic-assisted forming technology with a high frequency and small amplitude can significantly improve the forming quality of materials. Owing to the advantages of reduced forming force, improved surface quality, avoidance of forming defects, and strengthened surface structure, ultrasonic-assisted forming technology has been applied to increasingly advanced forming processes, such as incremental forming, spinning, and micro-forming. However, in the ultrasonic-assisted forming process, there are multiple ultrasonic mechanisms, such as the volume effect and surface effect. The explanation of the effect of ultrasonic vibration (UV) on plastic deformation remains controversial, hindering the development of related technologies. Recently, many researchers have proposed many new theories and technologies for ultrasonic-assisted forming. To summarize these developments, systematic discussions on mechanisms, theoretical models, and forming performances are provided in this review. On this basis, the limitations of the current study are discussed. In addition, an outlook for ultrasonic-assisted forming is proposed: efficient and stable UV systems, difficulty forming components with complex geometry, explanation of the in-depth mechanism, a systematic theoretical prediction model, and multi-field-coupling energy-assisted forming are considered to be hot spots in future studies. The present review enhances existing knowledge of ultrasonic-assisted forming, and facilitates a fast reference for related researchers.

Introduction

The development of high-end equipment in industries, particularly in the aviation and aerospace industry, urgently requires the development of component forming with respect to parameters such as high performance, light weight, high precision, resource saving, and environmental friendliness. Ultrasonic-assisted forming, where the ultrasonic field is supplemented during deformation, can meet the above requirements, and has become an advanced high-energy rate forming technology.

In the ultrasonic-assisted forming process, an ultrasonic frequency vibration is applied to the blank using a forming tool. The ultrasonic amplitude is generally within 100 μm, and the vibration frequency is between 20 kHz and 100 kHz. As shown in Figure 1, the ultrasonic-assisted forming system generally includes an ultrasonic generator, transducer, horn, and forming tool [1–3]. The ultrasonic generator converts the alternating current into a high-frequency electric-oscillation signal. The transducer converts the high-frequency electric oscillation signal into a high-frequency mechanical vibration through an inverse piezoelectric effect. The horn amplifies the ultrasonic amplitude of the transducer, and is connected to the forming tool, causing it to vibrate at a certain amplitude and frequency during the deformation.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of ultrasonic-assisted forming system [1–3]

Since the discovery of the “softening effect” by Blaha [4], where the forming force of zinc crystals is significantly reduced by superimposing ultrasonic vibration (UV) during deformation, many researchers have conducted a large number of follow-up studies. The main mechanisms of ultrasonic-assisted forming are the volume effect and surface effect [5, 6]. The volume effect refers to the phenomenon in which the material stress-strain relationship changes under the influence of UV. This phenomenon can be explained as follows: On the one hand, periodic loading and unloading in the forming process causes a stress superposition effect. On the other hand, UV produces an oscillation of the atoms, resulting in acoustic softening effect and residual effect. The surface effect refers to the phenomenon in which UV changes the micromorphology and roughness of the material surface. In addition, the friction force between the mold and blank changes [7, 8].

Ultrasonic-assisted forming technology has the advantages of reducing the forming force, improving the surface quality, preventing forming defects, and strengthening the surface structure. With the development of advanced technologies, such as microscopic observation and numerical simulation, there has been extensive ongoing research on the mechanism and modeling of ultrasonic-assisted forming. In addition, UV has been applied to an increasing number of advanced forming processes, such as incremental forming, spinning, and microforming [9–11]. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically summarize the latest developments in the field of ultrasonic-assisted forming and to analyze their advantages and limitations in order to facilitate fast referencing for researchers.

To this end, this paper presents a systematic review of related studies on ultrasonic-assisted forming. First, the different mechanisms of UV in the forming process are explained in detail. Second, the research progress of the theoretical models is discussed. Third, the advantages of using UV in different forming processes are discussed, and finally, future research directions related to ultrasonic-assisted forming are presented.

Mechanism of Ultrasonic-Assisted Forming

Researchers can understand the advantages of UV on the forming process by analyzing the mechanism of ultrasonic-assisted forming. Here, the current studies on the mechanism are reviewed from the perspectives of the volume effect and surface effect.

Volume Effect

Stress Superposition Effect

The stress superposition effect was first proposed by Nevill and Brotzen [12], who attributed the stress reduction phenomenon to the superposition effect of the stable static load and alternating vibration load. This type of superposition does not affect the microstructure of the material. As shown in Figure 2, the phenomenon of repeated elastic unloading and loading occurs when the ultrasonic horn vibrates along the loading direction. The ultrasonic horn moves in a downward direction, and the stress is reduced during the unloading stage. In contrast, the ultrasonic horn moves upwards, and the stress increases during the loading stage. Therefore, the stress-strain curve has a serrated shape. However, high-frequency dynamic force signals cannot be collected by conventional force sensors owing to their low acquisition frequency. Therefore, the actual measured stress-strain curve represents the mean stress-strain curve between the lower envelope curve and the original curve without UV.

Figure 2

Schematic diagram of stress superposition effect

However, the stress reduction phenomenon cannot be explained using only the stress superposition effect [13]. Some researchers found that the decrease in the forming force measured in the experiment was much larger than that predicted by the finite-element model. They attributed this phenomenon to a reduction in the friction force caused by the high-frequency vibration between the contact surfaces [14]. However, the stress superposition effect and friction reduction cannot fully explain the mechanism of the stress reduction phenomenon [15, 16]. Yao et al. [17] considered that the acoustic softening effect has a significant impact on the flow stress of a material. At present, researchers generally consider that the stress superposition effect dominates at low acoustic energies, while the acoustic softening effect dominates when the acoustic energy increases to a critical value [18, 19].

Acoustic Softening Effect

The acoustic softening effect refers to the phenomenon in which the application of UV during deformation influences the microstructure evolution and produces a reduction in the deformation resistance. However, this softening phenomenon disappeared immediately after the UV was stopped. When there is an acoustic softening effect, the yield strength and flow stress of the material are significantly reduced, whereas the elongation may be increased [20, 21]. The reduction in the flow stress caused by the acoustic softening effect is similar to that of thermal softening, but the acoustic energy that is required to produce the same degree of softening is 107 times less than the thermal energy. Therefore, the acoustic energy utilization efficiency is higher [4, 13, 22]. A noticeable softening phenomenon occurs when UV is applied in both the elastic and plastic deformation stages for many metals, such as copper, titanium, aluminum, and steel [21, 23–26].

In the ultrasonic-assisted micro-upsetting experiment, reducing the sample size increased the acoustic energy absorbed per unit volume, and the stress reduction also increased [27]. In the ultrasonic-assisted tension experiment, the deformation was concentrated in the region near the ultrasonic source with a higher acoustic energy [24]. The above phenomenon shows that the acoustic softening effect becomes more noticeable with an increase in the acoustic energy absorbed by the material. Acoustic energy is related to the ultrasonic amplitude and frequency. Therefore, many researchers consider that the stress reduction is approximately linearly proportional to the amplitude [23, 25, 26]. However, there are still contradictory reports. It was found that a lower vibration frequency led to a more significant acoustic softening effect in the ultrasonic-assisted compression of aluminum and titanium [2]. In addition, the amplitude had no significant effect on the acoustic softening during the uniaxial tensile experiment of the ultrathin miniaturized TA1 foil [28].

The temperature increase during the ultrasonic-assisted forming is negligible [20, 24, 29, 30]; therefore, the mechanism of acoustic softening is different from thermal softening. Generally, acoustic energy is preferentially absorbed by the dislocation tangle region and grain boundary. Therefore, a noticeable change in the microstructural evolution is produced [31].

The dislocation tangle region mainly absorbs the acoustic energy through three different mechanisms: resonance, relaxation, and hysteresis [13, 32]. To explain the influence of UV on the dislocation density, some researchers proposed the dipole annihilation theory: dislocations travel longer distances in a jerky manner in the presence of UV. Accordingly, there is a greater probability of opposite dislocation meetings and annihilation, and the dislocation density eventually decreases [33]. The dipole annihilation theory has been confirmed by several experimental results. As shown in Figure 3a, the application of UV during the tension process of DC04 steel specimens significantly reduced the dislocation density, and the dislocations were concentrated at the grain boundaries [29]. Moreover, UV gradually dissipated the dislocation tangles of the titanium foil, and the dislocations tended to be distributed in parallel along the ultrasonic propagation direction [34].

Figure 3

Microscopic mechanism of acoustic softening effect: a the effect of UV on dislocation density, b the effect of UV on grain evolution [33, 34]

The grain boundary is affected by UV mainly from two perspectives. First, the low-angle grain boundary increased as the dislocation slip increased. The volume fraction of the sub-grains also increased (Figure 3b) [33, 35, 36]. However, the acoustic energy is preferentially absorbed by the grain boundary, and grain rotation is promoted. As a result, the low-angle grain boundary gradually transformed into a high-angle grain boundary, and the volume fraction of the sub-grain also decreased (Figure 3c) [29, 37]. Under the effect of these two mechanisms, the grain boundary evolutions of different materials exhibit different trends. Moreover, with the assistance of UV, the deformation behavior is similar to that under a high strain rate because the material continues to oscillate at an extremely high speed. Therefore, twinning occurs more easily, leading to acoustic softening [28, 30].

The mechanisms of UV are different for materials with different crystalline structures and stacking fault energies. For aluminum with a faced-center cubic crystalline structure, the microscopic mechanism of acoustic softening is that UV promotes dislocation slip and the interaction between dislocations and precipitates [26]. For titanium with a body-centered cubic crystalline structure, the mechanism of acoustic softening is the interaction of the dislocation slip and twin boundary activation [28]. For copper with medium stacking fault energy, the lack of dynamic recovery results in a high dislocation density and discontinuous dynamic recrystallization during ultrasonic-assisted deformation. For aluminum with a high fault energy, geometric dynamic recrystallization caused by the pinching-off of serrated grain boundaries was observed after ultrasonic-assisted deformation [38].

Residual Effect

The residual effect refers to the phenomenon in which the flow stress rises or falls during the subsequent deformation after the UV is stopped. As shown in Figure 4, different ultrasonic residual effects were observed in the aluminum and titanium samples despite the similar ultrasonic softening effect. Aluminum exhibited a residual hardening phenomenon, whereas in titanium, the initial residual hardening effect was transferred to a residual softening effect with an increase in the amplitude of the applied ultrasonic vibration.

Figure 4

Residual effect of aluminum and titanium: a residual softening and hardening effects of UV with different vibration amplitudes and different vibration durations, b band contrast map with grain boundaries of aluminum and titanium [39]

The residual softening phenomenon appears for materials such as copper and titanium alloys [20, 23, 26, 39]. This phenomenon becomes more obvious with an increase in the amplitude and vibration duration. The dislocation density reduction, grain rotation, and misorientation reduction are considered to be the reasons for the residual softening phenomenon [24, 26]. Moreover, UV promotes the formation of deformation twinning. After the saturation of twinning, the incidence of twinning decreases with continuing deformation, and the strain hardening effect induced by deformation twinning is weakened [20, 39].

On the contrary, a significant residual hardening phenomenon appears for materials such as Ti-6Al-4V alloy and 1060 aluminum [25, 39]. This phenomenon can be explained by the grain refinement caused by UV and the boundary-strengthening mechanism based on the Hall-Petch effect.

Surface Effect

The application of UV in different directions can lead to a reduction in the sliding friction force [19, 40–42]. When the direction of the UV is parallel to the sliding direction, the reduction in the sliding friction force can be explained through the vector effect. Owing to the oscillations of the tool, the direction of the sliding friction force is consistent with the direction of the forming force during part of the vibration cycle, making the sliding friction force beneficial to deformation [43]. When the vibration direction is perpendicular to the sliding direction, the sliding friction force is always in the opposite direction to the resultant sliding velocity. However, the vibration of the forming tool causes an instantaneous friction force vector to present a deflection angle with the sliding direction, thereby reducing the average sliding friction force [40]. When the vibration direction is perpendicular to the contact surface, the dynamic loading decreases the average contact area between the tool and the blank. Moreover, the concave and convex parts of the contact surfaces produce tangential deformation under UV, thereby reducing the obstacle to slip. As a result, the sliding friction force is significantly reduced [44, 45]. As shown in Figure 5a, Cao et al. [45] performed an ultrasonic-assisted sheet metal friction test, and they found that the friction coefficient decreased by approximately 40% after UV was applied.

Figure 5

Surface effect of UV: a the mechanism of normal UV on friction and wear [45], b effect of UV on surface topography in micro-upsetting experiment of aluminum [17], c effect of ultrasonic dynamic impact during compression [53]

The application of UV during the deformation process also reduced the static friction force between the relatively stationary mold and blank. By performing the upsetting test, it was found that the UV significantly reduced the friction coefficient between the sample and the tool, while the contact surface adjacent to the ultrasonic source had a more significant reduction [46–48]. In addition, the reduction in the friction coefficient increases as the sample size decreases and the amplitude increases [16, 49]. The mechanism of UV on the static friction force mainly includes the following aspects: the micro-bulges and pits on the specimen surface reduce under the effect of UV, which diminishes the probability of occlusion with the micro-bulges and pits of the tool. The shear resistance to shear off the occlusal micro-bulges and pits was reduced. In addition, the application of UV can produce a local heating effect and reduce the local soldering between the mold/blank surfaces. Moreover, lubricants can more easily fill the contact surfaces and improve the surface lubrication conditions under the action of UV [47, 50].

The material flow on the surface was improved under the influence of friction reduction and local heating. Therefore, UV can significantly improve the surface quality of the sample [45]. In the ultrasonic-assisted micro-upsetting experiment of the aluminum, it was found that the roughness of the sample upper surface decreased from 1.5 μm to 0.9 μm after applying UV (Figure 5b) [17]. Moreover, the acoustic softening effect plays an important role in improving the surface topography. High-frequency vibration can soften the surface asperities and promote plastic deformation, resulting in an enhancement of the surface roughness [51, 52].

Furthermore, when the amplitude was increased to a critical value in the ultrasonic-assisted compression experiment, the load at the initial stage of deformation dropped to zero, and the deformed sample exhibited an anti-barreling shape (Figure 5c) [53, 54]. This phenomenon cannot be explained simply by the decrease in the friction coefficient. Therefore, the concept of the ultrasonic dynamic impact effect was proposed. When the amplitude exceeds a critical value, the UV produces a high-frequency contact-detachment phenomenon between the sample and tool. Under the action of the high-frequency impact of the tool, the surface of the sample undergoes severe plastic deformation and local heating, and the surface roughness is significantly reduced [55].

Discussion

The explanations for the volume and surface effects are summarized in Figure 6. The volume effect can be explained by the stress superposition effect and acoustic softening effect. The stress superposition effect indicates that UV does not affect the material microstructure. During the ultrasonic-assisted forming process, the sample was subjected to repeated elastic unloading and loading. Therefore, the stress-strain curve has a serrated shape, and the actual measured stress value is reduced. However, the acoustic softening effect indicates that UV changes the material microstructure during deformation. Acoustic energy is preferentially absorbed by defects such as dislocations and grain boundaries. Therefore, the dislocation slip, grain rotation, and twinning activation are promoted, and the plastic compatibility of the material is improved. Moreover, for different materials, the acoustic softening effect has different effects on the microstructure evolution, which leads to the completely opposite phenomenon of the residual effect after stopping UV.

Figure 6

Schematic diagram of ultrasonic-assisted forming mechanism

For the surface effect, the UV changes the contact state between the tool and the sample. Therefore, both the sliding and static friction forces are reduced. In addition, the acoustic softening effect softens the surface asperities and improves the surface roughness of the sample. Moreover, the ultrasonic dynamic impact effect occurs when the amplitude exceeds a critical value.

However, the experimental evidence and theoretical basis of the above assumptions are still unconvincing. There are noticeable differences in the reported effects of UV on the forming process for different sample sizes, UV application methods, and deformation states; the reasons for these differences have not yet been ascertained. There is still a lack of direct experimental verification for theories such as dipole annihilation and grain rotation. Moreover, there are coupling effects of multiple mechanisms such as the stress superposition effect, acoustic softening effect, and surface effect in the ultrasonic-assisted forming process. However, current studies have not realized a decoupling analysis of these mechanisms.

Theoretical Models of Ultrasonic-Assisted Forming

According to different ultrasonic mechanisms, research on theoretical models can be divided into two categories: (a) constitutive models for the volume effect, including phenomenological models and physically based models, and (b) theoretical models for the surface effect.

Models of Volume Effect

Phenomenological Models

To describe the phenomenon of acoustic softening and residual hardening, the mathematical model shown in Eq. (1) was constructed by introducing new parameters that reflect the ultrasonic defect intensity based on the synthetic theory of plastic deformation [56–58].

$$H^{2} = \psi + \frac{2}{3}\sigma_{S}^{2} + F\left( {\left| {\vec{s}} \right|,U} \right)\psi_{u} ,\psi = r\varphi ,$$

(1)

where ψ is the defect intensity induced during plastic straining under (quasi) static loading, and ψ_u is the defect intensity induced by UV. Function F governs the manifestation of ultrasonic hardening or softening.

A constitutive model of 6063 aluminum alloy under ultrasonic-assisted upsetting at 298 K was constructed, as shown in Eq. (2), based on the Johnson-Cook model and the experimental results [59]:

$$\Sigma = \left( {C_{1} + C_{2} \varepsilon^{n} } \right)\left[ {1 + \left( {C_{3} \ln \frac{{\dot{\varepsilon }}}{{\dot{\varepsilon }_{r} }}} \right)} \right],$$

(2)

where C₃ is a constant. The stress-strain relationship under different ultrasonic conditions is reflected by varying the values of C₁, C₂, and n. For convenience, C₁₀, C₂₀, and n₀ represent the JC model parameters of conventional upsetting, while C_1V, C_2V, and n₀ represent those of ultrasonic-assisted upsetting, respectively.

Based on the varying trends of C₁₀/C_1V, C_2VC₂₀, and n_V/n₀ with the amplitudes and frequencies, the following relationships can be proposed:

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}ll} {C_{10} /C_{1V} = \alpha_{1} A^{2} f^{2} + \alpha_{2} A + \alpha_{3} f^{2} + \alpha_{4} ,} \\ {C_{2V} /C_{20} = \beta_{1} A + \beta_{2} f + \beta_{3} ,} \\ {n_{V} /n_{0} = \eta_{1} A + \eta_{2} f + \eta_{3} ,}\end{array} } \right.$$

(3)

where A and f are the amplitude and frequency, respectively. This modified model reflects a decrease in the yield stress and an increase in the hardening index. However, the accuracy of the prediction results deteriorates under excessively high strain rates. To solve this problem, a cubic term of strain ε is added to improve the prediction accuracy of the Johnson-Cook model, as shown in Eq. (4) [60

$$\sigma = \left[ {A + B_{3} \varepsilon + B_{4} \varepsilon^{2} + B_{5} \varepsilon^{3} } \right]\left( {1 + C_{2} \ln \dot{\varepsilon }^{*} } \right).$$

(4)

Models Based on Physical Mechanism

A model for acoustic plasticity was developed to show the effects of UV on metal plasticity based on the crystal plasticity theory [61, 62]. Acoustic softening is described through the thermal activation theory [63, 64]. Substituting $kT\text{ln}\left({\dot{\gamma }}_{0}/{\dot{\gamma }}_{p}\right)/\Delta F$ with W, the non-dimensional stress ratio $\lambda$ of the critical resolved shear stress τ to the mechanical threshold $\widehat{\tau }$ in the active slip system is given as

$$\lambda = \frac{\tau }{{\hat{\tau }}} = 1 - W.$$

(5)

In this model, the acoustic softening effect is mainly attributed to changes in the frequency factor ${\dot{\gamma }}_{0}$ and/or the activation energy $\Delta F$. Therefore, the stress ratio during UV can be expressed as

$$\lambda_{V} = 1 - W_{V} = 1 - \left( {W_{0} +\Delta W_{V} } \right),$$

(6)

where subscript v indicates a variable under vibration, and subscript 0 indicates a variable without vibration or other forms of excitation energy. W_V consists of the value without vibration (W₀) and the net change due to vibration (ΔW_V). The changes in ${\dot{\gamma }}_{0}$ and/or ΔF are reflected in ΔW_V. Therefore, the change in the non-dimensional stress ratio induced by the acoustic softening effect is modeled using Eq. (7):

$$\Delta \lambda = \lambda_{V} - \lambda_{0} = - \Delta W_{v} = - \beta \left( {E_{u} /\hat{\tau }} \right)^{m} ,$$

(7)

where E_u is the acoustic energy density, and β and m are parameters to be determined experimentally.

Based on the dislocation evolution theory [65], the residual hardening effect was attributed to a change in the dislocation density. A logistic function was used to correct the dislocation storage coefficient, k₁. The revised dislocation density evolution model is shown in Eq. (8):

$$\frac{{{\text{d}}\rho }}{{{\text{d}}\gamma }} = k_{1} \left( {1 + \frac{K}{{1 + \left( {K/P_{0} - 1} \right)e^{{\Phi \zeta_{V} }} }}} \right)\sqrt \rho - k_{2} \rho .$$

(8)

A similar work was carried out by Li et al. [9]. An exponential function was used to correct the dislocation storage coefficient, k₁:

$$k_{1} = k_{10} \xi_{2} A^{\eta } ,$$

(9)

where k₁₀ is the pre-determined value based on the material properties, and ξ₂ and η are determined based on the experiment. As a result, a modified acoustic softening model reflecting the change in both the thermal activation and dislocation evolution processes is expressed as

$$\left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}ll} {\sigma = MG\alpha b\sqrt \rho \left\{ {\left[ {1 - kT\ln \left( {\frac{{\dot{\gamma }_{0} }}{{\dot{\gamma }_{p} }}} \right)/0.5Gb^{3} } \right] - \beta \left( {\frac{{E_{u} }}{G\alpha b\sqrt \rho }} \right)^{m} } \right\},} \\ {\frac{{{\text{d}}\rho }}{{{\text{d}}\gamma }} = k_{10} \xi_{2} A^{\eta } \sqrt \rho - \left( {k_{20} \left( {\frac{{\dot{\varepsilon }}}{{\dot{\varepsilon }_{0} }}} \right)^{ - 1/n} } \right)\rho .} \end{array} } \right.$$

(10)

Deshpande et al. [36] considered that the mechanism of the acoustic softening effect is that the strain rate factor ${\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}$ and the dynamic recovery term k₂ increase owing to the addition of acoustic energy during deformation. Thus, the dislocation density (and thus microstructure) evolution changes accordingly. The modified equation for ${\dot{\varepsilon }}_{0}$ is as follows:

$$\dot{\varepsilon }_{0} = \dot{\varepsilon }_{00} \exp \left( {\frac{{ - Q_{d} \chi }}{{kTE_{u} }}} \right),$$

(11)

where ${\dot{\varepsilon }}_{00}$ is a constant, and χ is a constant with unit of J/m³.

Prabhakar et al. [66] proposed a constitutive model based on the dislocation density. The K-M model was used as the basic model framework, and parameters α and n were modified to reflect the influence of UV.

$$\alpha = \alpha_{0} \beta_{1} \left\{ {\dot{\varepsilon }^{{\beta_{2} }} T^{{\beta_{3} }} + \frac{{\beta_{4} }}{{\beta_{1} }}A^{{2\beta_{5} }} } \right\},$$

(12)

$$n = \beta_{6} \left\{ {T^{{\beta_{7} }} + \frac{{\beta_{8} }}{{\beta_{6} }}A^{{2\beta_{9} }} } \right\},$$

(13)

where ${\alpha }_{0}$ is the athermal coefficient, and β_1‒9 are material constants that account for the strain rate, temperature, and UV. The acoustic softening effect is accommodated through the constants β₄ and β₅, and the residual hardening effect can be incorporated by treating the material constant β₆ depending on the history of the induced ultrasonic pulses during plastic deformation.

In the study by Sedaghat et al. [67], the additive acoustic work of UV is defined as the amount of acoustic stress σ_acoustic on the effective activation volume:

$$\Delta F = \Delta G - \sigma_{acoustic} V.$$

(14)

Considering the energy loss during ultrasonic transmission to overcome the barrier energy, an efficiency factor (η) is introduced as follows:

$$\sigma_{eff,acoustic} = \eta \omega A\sqrt {\rho E} ,$$

(15)

where ω is the ultrasonic frequency, E is the elastic modulus, and c is the sound velocity of the sample. The exact effective activation volume (V) can be approximated using a compensation factor, λ:

$$V = \lambda \sqrt 3 kT\left( {\frac{{\partial \ln \dot{\varepsilon }}}{\partial \sigma }} \right).$$

(16)

Considering the drag stress at a very high strain, the overall flow stress can then be expressed as

$$\begin{aligned} \sigma & = \sigma_{G} + \hat{\sigma }_{th} \left\{ {1 - \left[ { - c_{2} \left( {T\ln \left( {\dot{\varepsilon }/\dot{\varepsilon }_{0} } \right) + \frac{{\xi_{3} V\omega A\sqrt {\rho E} }}{k}} \right)} \right]^{1/q} } \right\}^{1/p} \\ & \quad + a\dot{\varepsilon }^{b} . \\ \end{aligned}$$

(17)

Wang et al. [68] considered the influence of the stress superposition effect, and the stress reduction caused by the stress superposition effect was calculated according to the amplitude.

$$\Delta \sigma_{su} = - K\left( {\alpha_{t} A} \right)^{n} ,$$

(18)

where α_t is the transmission coefficient, A is the amplitude, n is the hardening exponent, and K is the material strength coefficient.

Consequently, the total reduction in the yield stress considering both the acoustic softening (∆σ_s0) and stress superposition (∆σ_su) is expressed as

$$\Delta \sigma_{s} = \Delta \sigma_{s0} + \Delta \sigma_{su} .$$

(19)

Furthermore, Hu et al. [55] considered the elastic deformation of the experimental equipment, and the force reduction ΔF caused by the stress superposition effect was obtained as

$$\Delta F = AK.$$

(20)

The hybrid stiffness K is derived as

$$K = \frac{{K_{a} \cdot K_{s} }}{{K_{a} + K_{s} }}.$$

(21)

K_a and K_s are the stiffness values of the experimental equipment and specimen, respectively. Considering the modification coefficient ξ₁ for the friction and transmission loss of acoustic energy, the true stress reduction ∆σ_su is derived as follows:

$$\Delta \sigma_{su} = \xi_{1} \frac{{\Delta F\left( {1 - \frac{{D_{a} }}{{H_{0} }}} \right)}}{{\uppi r_{0}^{2} H_{0} }}.$$

(22)

Meng et al. [30] considered that the acoustic stress can be calculated by subtracting the stress reduction value caused by UV from the stress value calculated using the K-M model. The stress reduction caused by the stress superposition effect is derived as

$$\Delta \sigma_{su} = R_{1} \frac{EA}{{L_{0} }},$$

(23)

where L₀ is the length of the specimen’s reduced section, and R₁ is a coefficient that reflects the influence of vibration damping. Furthermore, the stress reduction induced by acoustic softening has an exponential relationship with the acoustic energy density.

$$\Delta \sigma_{s0} = R_{2} E_{u}^{C} ,$$

(24)

where R₂ is a coefficient affected by the energy absorption and loss, and the exponent C is an experimental parameter ranging from 0.5 to 1.

According to the coupled effect of UV and the grain size, the stress softening induced by UV has a saturation value [69]. Therefore, the modified acoustic softening term can be written as

$$\Delta \sigma_{s0} = \frac{{R_{2} }}{{1 + \beta_{1} \exp \left( { - \beta_{2} E_{u} } \right)}}.$$

(25)

The parameter R₂ reflects the saturated reduction value caused by acoustic softening, and is negatively related to grain size D:

$$R_{2} = a + bD^{ - 1} ,$$

(26)

In terms of the crystal plasticity finite-element model, Siddiq and Sayed [31, 70] reported a modified evolution law for the plastic slip in system i. The modified model considering the acoustic softening effect is given by

$$\dot{\gamma }^{i} = \gamma_{0}^{i} {\text{sgn}} \left( {\tau^{i} } \right)\left\{ {\left| {\frac{{\tau^{i} }}{{g^{i} U_{soft} }}} \right|} \right\}^{m} ,$$

(27)

where U_soft is the ultrasonic softening term exponentially related to the acoustic energy density [71]:

$$U_{soft} = \left( {1 - d_{ut} E_{u} } \right)^{{e_{ut} }} ,$$

(28)

where d_ut and e_ut are acoustic softening parameters found from experiments.

Comparison of Different Models

The phenomenological model only describes the stress-strain relationship of the material through mathematical methods without considering the physical mechanism. This is convenient for the simulation calculations of an actual forming process. However, the parameters in this model have no actual physical meaning. In contrast, the crystal plasticity finite-element model reflects the influence of UV on microstructure evolution, but the calculation speed of the model is slow. For the internal variable model, the microscopic evolution mechanism and macroscopic mechanical response of the material were considered simultaneously. Therefore, both the physical authenticity and speed of the model were achieved.

Based on the crystal plasticity theory, including the thermal activation model and dislocation dynamics model, ultrasonic parameters, such as the amplitude, frequency, and acoustic energy density, were induced to reflect the volume effect (Figure 7). In the model established by Yao et al. [62], the acoustic softening phenomenon was described by modifying the thermal activation theory, and the residual hardening phenomenon was reflected by modifying the dislocation evolution model. The combined acoustic plasticity model accurately captured the acoustic softening and hardening in aluminum. The predicted stress–strain response of the vibration-assisted upsetting agreed well with the experimental results. To reflect the influence of the dislocation density on the acoustic softening effect, Li and Deshpande et al. [9, 36] modified k₁ and k₂, which are respectively the coefficients of the dislocation storage term that causes thermal hardening and the dislocation annihilation term accounting for the dynamic recovery. The relationship between the mechanical threshold $\widehat{\tau }$ and dislocation density ρ was established based on the K-M model. Good agreement was found between the predictions and experimental results through the reasonable selection of parameters in the model. In addition, Prabhakar et al. [66] modified the parameters α and n in their established dislocation density-based model. The acoustic softening effect and residual effect during the tensile tests can be accurately described by varying the parameters β_(1‒9).

Figure 7

Ultrasonic-assisted forming models considering volume effect based on crystal plasticity theory

There is significant dissipation and attenuation of acoustic energy in the actual forming process. Therefore, an effective coefficient ξ₃ = ηλ reflecting the acoustic energy transfer efficiency was introduced in the acoustic softening model [67]. The accurate prediction of the forming force of the aluminum in the ultrasonic-assisted upsetting, pressing, and incremental forming is realized by varying the effective coefficient. Moreover, some researchers considered employing the stress superposition effect to further improve the accuracy of the model [30, 55, 68, 69]. The stress reduction caused by the stress superposition effect is regarded as a variable related to the amplitude and elastic modulus.

Models of Surface Effect

There are three basic ways in which touching bodies vibrate against each other: (1) in-plane vibration in the sliding direction, (2) in-plane vibration perpendicular to the sliding direction, and (3) out-of-plane vibration perpendicular to the contact surface. To describe friction reduction, Storck et al. [41, 72] proposed an analytical model based on the Coulomb friction model. When the direction of the UV is perpendicular to the sliding direction, the average friction force ${\overline{F} }_{R,x}$ can be expressed as:

$$\overline{F}_{R,x} \left( \zeta \right) = - \mu F_{N} \frac{2}{{\uppi \sqrt {1 + \frac{1}{{\zeta^{2} }}} }}K\left( {\frac{1}{{1 + \zeta^{2} }}} \right){\text{sgn}} \left( \zeta \right),\;\zeta = \frac{{v^{*} }}{{\hat{v}}},$$

(29)

where ζ is the ratio of the macroscopic velocity ${v}^{*}$ to the velocity amplitude of the harmonic component $\widehat{v}$. The reduction in the friction coefficient μ_{perpendicular} is defined by Eq. (30) as follows:

$$\mu_{perpendicular} \left( \zeta \right) = \frac{{\overline{F}_{R,x} \left( \zeta \right)}}{{ - \mu F_{N} }}.$$

(30)

When the direction of the UV is in-plane in the sliding direction, the average friction coefficient can be expressed as:

$$\mu_{parallel} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}ll} {1,} & {\zeta \ge 1,} \\ {\frac{2}{{\uppi }}\sin^{ - 1} \left( \zeta \right),} & { - 1 < \zeta < 1,} \\ { - 1,} & {\zeta \le - 1.} \\ \end{array} } \right.$$

(31)

Kumar et al. [40] established a theoretical prediction model for the friction in two vibration directions (Figure 8a). They found that the reduction in friction caused by the in-plane vibration in the sliding direction was greater than that caused by the in-plane vibration perpendicular to the sliding direction. Similar work was also done by Popv et al. [73, 74]. As shown in Figure 8b, the friction prediction models for three directions of ultrasonic application were established.

Figure 8

Friction models under different UV directions based on the classic Coulomb friction model: a Kumar models, b Popv models [40, 73, 74]

However, the above models are all based on the Coulomb friction model. In these models, the deformation in the contact zone was not considered, which led to a low prediction accuracy. To this end, dynamic Dahl’s and Dupont’s friction models [75, 76] that consider the elastoplastic characteristics of the contact surfaces were used. Dynamic friction prediction models were established when the in-plane vibration direction was parallel and perpendicular to the sliding direction [77, 78]. As shown in Figure 9, the maximum friction force ${F}_{F}$ is related to the elastic strain z, and the elastic strain rate $\dot{z}$ is related to the relative sliding velocity ${v}_{r}$ in the friction models of Dahl and Dupont. The prediction accuracy of the model is significantly improved compared with that of the classic Coulomb friction model. Moreover, Jadav et al. [79] combined these models and developed an analytical friction model for sliding bodies with coupled longitudinal and transverse vibrations.

Figure 9

Friction model based on Dahl’s and Dupont’s friction models [77, 78]

When the UV direction was perpendicular to the contact surface, the plastic deformation of the contact surfaces changed the actual contact area. The friction model for a metal sheet was established based on the elastoplastic contact mechanics of rough surfaces [45]. The total actual contact area ${A}_{r}$, which is the summation of the elastic and plastic areas, can be computed as follows:

$$A_{r} = A_{e} + A_{p} ,$$

(32)

$$A_{e} = \frac{{c\uppi \beta A_{n} }}{{\lambda^{2} }}\left[ {1 - \left( {1 + \lambda \frac{{\omega_{c} }}{{R_{q} }}} \right)e^{{ - \lambda \omega_{c} /R_{q} }} } \right]e^{{ - \lambda d/R_{q} }} ,$$

(33)

$$A_{p} = \frac{{c\uppi \beta A_{n} }}{{\lambda^{2} }}\left( {2 + \lambda \frac{{\omega_{c} }}{{R_{q} }}} \right)e^{{ - \lambda \left( {d + \omega_{c} } \right)/R_{q} }} .$$

(34)

Therefore, the dynamic friction after applying UV is acquired by

$$F^{\prime}_{t} = \frac{2}{T}\int\limits_{0}^{T/2} {K^{\prime}_{t} \delta {\text{d}}t} = \frac{2}{T}\int\limits_{0}^{T/2} {\frac{{A^{\prime{2}}_{r} E^{*} \left( {\delta + u} \right)}}{{\left( {d + v} \right)^{3} }}} {\text{d}}t.$$

(35)

Discussion

With the constant iteration and refinement of researchers, theoretical models of acoustic plasticity have become increasingly reliable. The volume and surface effects during uniaxial tension, compression, and friction tests can be accurately predicted by introducing ultrasonic parameters such as amplitude, acoustic energy density, and effective coefficient into typical models. This is beneficial when analyzing the material deformation characteristics in the ultrasonic-assisted forming process, and provides a basis for understanding the underlying mechanisms of UV.

However, there are still some problems when applying the modified model to the actual forming process. During the actual ultrasonic-assisted forming process, the material is constrained by multiple molds, and the vibration mode is not constant. Material forming is a dynamic process, and the dissipation rate of the acoustic energy changes dynamically. Thus, it is not appropriate to characterize the dissipation effect using a constant. In addition, the natural frequency of the material changes with the accumulation of plastic deformation, thereby reducing the prediction accuracy of the model. Therefore, a theoretical model that predicts the effect of UV should be established by comprehensively considering the influence of various factors.

Discussion of Advantages in Processing Performance

As shown in Figure 10, for different forming processes, there are different advantages of UV with respect to the processing performance, and they mainly including the following points: (a) reducing the forming force during deformation, (b) improving the surface quality of the workpiece, (c) improving the forming limit and preventing forming defects, and (d) strengthening the surface structure and improving the material fatigue life and corrosion resistance.

Figure 10

Advantages in processing performance [10, 52, 80–87]

Reduce the Forming Force

The forming force can be significantly reduced by applying UV to the mold or blank during deformation. During the incremental forming of aluminum, the vertical and horizontal forces were reduced by 23.5% and 26.3%, respectively [80, 88]. During the extrusion process of 1015 carbon steel, the forming force was reduced from 70 kN to 30 kN by applying axial UV to the tool [89]. A similar phenomenon also occurs in forming processes such as upsetting [90], deep drawing [13, 91], and equal-channel angular pressing (ECAP) [92].

The UV application method significantly impacts the reduction in the forming force. During the wire drawing process, the radial UV applied to the die reduced the drawing force more effectively than the axial UV [42, 93]. The load reduction caused by the longitudinal and torsional composite UV was more obvious compared with the above two application methods (Figure 11a) [81]. However, in the process of ECAP, the force reduction was more obvious when the vertical UV was directly applied to the blank compared with the application of the axial UV to the punch and the horizontal UV to the blank (Figure 11b) [94, 95]. Moreover, the magnitude of the force reduction can be improved by increasing the ultrasonic power, frequency, and amplitude within a certain range [96, 97].

Figure 11

The influence of UV on forming force: a wire drawing [81]; b ECAP [94]

There are two possible reasons for the reduction in forming force. First, the lubrication condition between the blank and the mold is improved after applying UV owing to the surface effect, while the friction coefficient and forming force are reduced accordingly [42, 89, 96, 98]. Second, the UV can significantly reduce the flow stress during deformation owing to the volume effect, and a greater ultrasonic power results in a more significant reduction in the flow stress [67, 89, 94]. Moreover, the force reduction and temperature increase caused by UV are noticeable for materials with high yield strength [3].

Improve the Surface Quality

Surface quality directly affects the performance of the workpiece. As shown in Figure 12, the application of UV significantly reduced the surface roughness in processes such as upsetting [52], drawing [81, 96], incremental forming [80, 88, 99], extrusion [82, 89, 100] and spinning [10]. In addition, there were noticeable differences in the improvement effects produced by different UV application methods. In the wire drawing process of titanium, the furrows became narrow and fragments and transverse cracks decreased after applying the longitudinal UV to the die. However, the fragments and transverse cracks nearly vanished, but the furrows became much longer and larger after applying the longitudinal and torsional composite UV (Figure 12b) [81].

Figure 12

Effect of UV on surface quality: a upsetting [52], b wire drawing [81], c extrusion [100]

The effect of UV on the surface quality of the blank can be explained as follows. First, the movement direction of the mold changes periodically under the action of UV. Thus, the static friction force is converted into sliding friction, and the material flow on the blank surface is improved. Second, the mold impacts the surface of the blank at a high frequency, thereby softening the surface asperities of the blank. The material flows from the bump to the pit under the action of the mold, thereby improving the surface topography. Moreover, UV increases the temperature between the mold/blank contact surfaces, thereby increasing the effectiveness of the lubricant [10, 52, 81, 101].

Generally, the surface quality improves as the amplitude increases [52, 97]. However, under an excessively high amplitude, the high-frequency impact of the mold excessively increases the temperature between the mold/blank contact surfaces and reduces the lubricant effectiveness. Moreover, there is adhesive friction between the mold and blank at high temperatures, which causes damage to the blank surface and deteriorates the surface quality [10, 81].

Avoid Forming Defects

Forming defects such as wrinkles and cracks are prone to appear during the forming process owing to the uneven deformation distribution. After applying UV, the acoustic energy is absorbed by the internal defects of the blank, thereby reducing the deformation resistance and improving the material flow [27, 67, 101]. In addition, high-frequency vibrations produce local high temperatures at the mold/blank contact surfaces. As a result, the residual stress is reduced and the forming accuracy is improved [3].

The prevention of forming defects through UV has been applied in many forming processes (Figure 13). In the process of deep drawing, the application of high-frequency vibration to the blank holder and die increased the drawing height and reduced the wrinkles of the blank [83, 91]. In the incremental forming process, the application of UV to the tool reduces the springback coefficient and improves the dimensional accuracy of the workpiece [80, 88, 101]. In the copper micro-extrusion process, the application of UV promoted plastic deformation and grain refinement [82]. In the process of ECAP, UV increases the efficiency of grain refinement and eliminates folding defects [95]. In addition, the yield strength and tensile strength of the formed workpiece increased accordingly [84, 102]. In addition, the above-mentioned effects become more noticeable with an increase in the ultrasonic power and amplitude.

Figure 13

Effect of UV on forming defects: a drawing [93], b extrusion [82], c ECAP [95]

Strengthen Surface Structure

To improve the performance of the workpiece, the surface plastic forming method was used for surface modification in the final stage of processing. In recent years, researchers have developed various surface treatment (UST) processes based on UV, such as ultrasonic shot peening [103–105], ultrasonic impact treatment [106–108], and ultrasonic surface rolling [85, 109, 110]; the principles of the different UST processes are similar. Severe plastic deformation on the material surface is caused by high-frequency vibration tools, which rapidly change the structure of the surface layer and improve the mechanical properties of the material, such as the elongation and yield ratio [86, 87, 108, 111–115].

Owing to the uneven deformation distribution along the thickness direction, the UST can obtain a gradient structure composed of a thermal-mechanical coupled layer, an elongated nanograin layer, an elongated ultrafine grain layer, refined grain, and a low-strain matrix layer from the surface to the inside. In addition, the microhardness presents a gradient distribution, as shown in Figure 14a [110]. A high-density base texture is formed on the material surface after UST [107, 116], and the grain size was refined to within 100 nm. Moreover, the refined grain layer thickness, surface hardness, and hardening rate will increase as the treatment time and amplitude increase [86, 105, 117].

Figure 14

Strengthen surface structure via UST: a surface gradient microstructure [110], b improvement of fatigue resistance [106], c improvement of the corrosion resistance [129]

Dislocation slip is the main mechanism for nano-grain formation, while twinning provides a synergistic effect under conditions of high strain rate and high deformation. The grains sub-divided into sub-grain boundaries are transformed into nano-lath structures by the dislocation slip, and the direction of the nano-lath is dominated by the slip direction. Twinning affects the refinement of nano-lath microstructures owing to the interaction between twinning and dislocation, resulting in the formation of equiaxed nanograins. In addition, the precipitation phase also plays a positive role in grain refinement [110].

The UST generates a residual compressive stress on the workpiece surface, thereby improving the damage tolerance and fatigue life of the material [103, 104, 118–123]. For the Ti-6Al-4V alloy, the fatigue strength was increased by 60%–72.7% and the fatigue lifetime was extended by two orders of magnitude using UST (Figure 14b) [106, 109, 124]. Moreover, the fretting fatigue lifetime of 300M steel increased by a factor of 4.7 times that of UST [125]. Generally, the gradient distributions of grain size, residual stress, and microhardness can be considered as the reasons for improving the fretting fatigue lifetime, and the residual compressive stress plays the most critical role [126].

Furthermore, UST can improve the corrosion resistance of materials [125, 127, 128]. The exfoliation corrosion sensitivity of AA7150 alloy decreased after UST. In addition, the micro-scale intergranular corrosion was inhibited, and the pitting potential shifted in the positive direction for both the normal and transverse planes (Figure 14c) [129]. This enhancement in corrosion resistance is attributed to the formation of equiaxed nanograins on the material surface.

Conclusion and Outlook

In this paper, a systematic and detailed review of studies on ultrasonic-assisted forming is presented. First, the basic principle of ultrasonic-assisted forming was introduced. Second, the macro and micro mechanisms of UV on deformation were discussed from the perspective of the volume effect and surface effect. Then, different theoretical models were compared. Finally, the advantages of UV in terms of the processing performance were discussed. It is shown that UV promotes material flow during deformation and has huge advantages in terms of improving the forming performance. However, there are still challenges in the widespread application of ultrasonic-assisted forming. Owing to restrictions such as the modification cost and equipment stability, most ultrasonic-assisted forming technologies are still in the laboratory stage. In addition, even though there are many existing studies, there is no systematic and clear explanation of the UV mechanism. Moreover, the prediction accuracy of related models also needs to be improved. Based on the above challenges, the detailed outlooks in the ultrasonic-assisted forming are identified by incorporating them with the analysis of Figure 15.

Figure 15

Development of future ultrasonic-assisted forming technologies [69, 130–133]

• (1) Develop high-efficiency, stable, intelligent, and high-power ultrasonic equipment.

  Compared with the continuous in-depth studies in ultrasonic-assisted forming, practical applications in factories are still rare. This situation may be caused by the complicated ultrasonic equipment structure and the high cost. Moreover, the inherent resonant frequency of the blank changes with dynamic deformation, resulting in the instability of the UV. To improve the performance of the ultrasonic equipment and reduce the cost, in future, it is necessary to develop an ultrasonic transducer with a higher output power, as well as an ultrasonic generator with online feedback and intelligent adjustment functions of amplitude and frequency.

• (2) Application of ultrasonic-assisted forming to difficult-to-form components.

  In this study, the geometric structure of the component formed by the ultrasonic-assisted forming process was relatively simple. For difficult-to-form components made of superalloys such as titanium, defects such as wrinkling and cracking are prone to occur during deformation owing to the high yield strength, high hardening rate, and complex geometric structures. Therefore, it is important to study the deformation laws and improve the forming quality of difficult-to-form components by applying UV.

  Furthermore, the deformation conditions of difficult-to-form components are complicated. The stress and strain states in different regions of the component are different, and the effects of UV are different. Therefore, it is necessary to study the reasonable control of the uneven deformation and strengthening of difficult-to-form components in the ultrasonic-assisted forming process.

• (3) Understand the mechanism of UV.

  Existing explanations of the ultrasonic mechanism could reveal the behavior of ultrasonic-assisted forming under certain conditions. However, these explanations are unconvincing because of the lack of reliable experimental verification and theoretical analyses. Therefore, scientific experiments should be conducted to study the influence of the material structure, scale effect, UV application method, and stress state on the ultrasonic-assisted forming process in the future. Thus, a more essential explanation of the ultrasonic mechanism should be provided on a microscopic scale.

  Recently, in situ, quasi-in-situ electron backscattered diffraction technology and in situ transmission electron microscope (TEM) technology have been increasingly used in the study of microscopic evolution mechanisms. Therefore, the real-time observation of the influence of UV on the evolution of dislocations and grains is critical to further verify these theories, such as dislocation dipole annihilation and grain rotation. In addition, it is important to realize a decoupling analysis of complex mechanisms such as stress superposition, the acoustic softening effect, and the ultrasonic dynamic impact in the ultrasonic-assisted forming process.

• (4) Establish systematic and accurate theoretical models.

  A systematic and accurate theoretical model can help to guide the design of ultrasonic-assisted forming processes. However, existing models do not fully consider the coupling between multiple ultrasonic mechanisms. This review argues that the theoretical model of the ultrasonic-assisted forming process should be developed from the following two perspectives.

  First, based on a deep understanding of the ultrasonic mechanism, a microstructure prediction model should be established via crystal plasticity, molecular dynamics, and other methods. Therefore, the effect of UV on the atom vibration, dislocation slip, and grain rotation will be predicted accurately, and the relationship between the microstructural evolution and the macroscopic mechanical properties will be established. However, the stress state and the acoustic energy transmission efficiency constantly change during the ultrasonic-assisted forming process. Therefore, it is necessary to accurately describe the transmission efficiency of acoustic energy and to comprehensively examine the impact of multiple ultrasonic mechanisms on the deformation.

• (5) Multi-field coupling to improve the forming quality.

  Compared with a single acoustic energy field, the application of multiple energy fields, for example, acoustic fields, magnetic fields, electropulsing, and lasers in the forming process can significantly improve the forming quality. For example, by performing electropulsing-assisted ultrasonic surface rolling, the surface quality of the workpiece is significantly improved, while the surface cracks and defects are reduced [134]. Moreover, a nano/submicroscale oxide structure can be achieved on Ti6Al4V through an ultrasonic shot peening-induction heating approach [135]. From the above examples, it is shown that multi-field-coupling assisted forming technologies will become a research hotspot in the future.