 Original Article
 Open access
 Published:
Influence of Shear Effects on the Characteristics of Axisymmetric Wave Propagation in a Buried FluidFilled Pipe
Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering volume 35, Article number: 74 (2022)
Abstract
The acoustic propagation characteristics of axisymmetric waves have been widely used in leak detection of fluidfilled pipes. The related acoustic methods and equipment are gradually coming to the market, but their theoretical research obviously lags behind the field practice, which seriously restricts the breakthrough and innovation of this technology. Based on the fully threedimensional effect of the surrounding medium, a coupled motion equation of axisymmetric wave of buried liquidfilled pipes is derived in detail, a contact coefficient is used to express the coupling strength between surrounding medium and pipe, then, a general equation of motion was derived which contain the pipe soil lubrication contact, pipe soil compact contact and pipe in water and air. Finally, the corresponding numerical calculation model is established and solved used numerical method. The shear effects of the surrounding medium and the shear effects at the interface between surrounding medium and pipe are discussed in detail. The output indicates that the surrounding medium is to add mass to the pipe wall, but the shear effect is to add stiffness. With the consideration of the contact strength between the pipe and the medium, the additional mass and the pipe wall will resonate at a specific frequency, resulting in a significant increase in the radiation wave to the surrounding medium. The research contents have great guiding effect on the theory of acoustic wave propagation and the engineering application of leak detection technology in the buried pipe.
1 Introduction
With the development of urbanisation in past decades, the component like pipe has become a necessary means of liquid and gas transportation. The issue of plumbing leakage is a widespread concern in both industry and academy due to its social, environmental and economic utility. It has been estimated that, in mainland China, current direct economic losses caused by underground pipe network leaks exceed 200 billion Yuan (approximately 22.65 billion pound sterling), sometimes the pipe leakage might cause unexpected major source of hidden danger not only for damaging urban biological environment and the security of people's lives and properties. The latest research of the ‘track and trace’ technology for buried pipelines, which is widely used in the transportation of liquid and gas media such as crude oil and natural gas, is being widely discussed and studied extensively. Acoustic detection methods has attracted more attention because of such nondestructive evaluation does not directly destroy the structure of the original piping system [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8]. When the leaking of the pipeline happened, the highpressure fluid in the pipe will be pressured out of the pipeline and cause unavoidable noise, The acoustic leak detection method is used to detect the events of leaks in different locations of the pipeline, using crosscorrelation technique to estimate the delay of leakage noise between two measuring points, then the location of leakage would be calculated [9]. The effectiveness of these methods much depends on the rationality of the selection of the propagation characteristic parameters of the dominant wave in the pipeline.
The studies of the acoustic characteristics and propagation mechanism of pipes is developed with pipe leak detection. At present, the acoustic leak detection and location of pipelines are usually carried out by time delay estimation method, which depends strongly on wave propagation characteristics. The early research was mainly to solve the wave equation in thinwalled shell pipe, in which the external medium outside pipes is considered vacuum. Fuller, et al. [10] derived the propagation characteristics of n = 0 wave within elastic fluidfilled pipes in vacuo defined as “hard” and “soft” shells, then the energy distribution of radial input force and internal pressure fluctuation under various waveforms is studied theoretically [11]. Xu et al. [12] studied the vibration propagation characteristics of liquid filling pipes in a vacuum environment. Pinnington et al. [13] established an acoustic propagation model of cast iron pipes without considering the dispersion characteristics, after that, studied the n = 0 wave propagation characteristic and transfer equation of the pressurised pipes [14, 15]. With the development of pipe research, the influence of the medium around the pipes has gradually attracted people's attention. Sinha et al. [16] studied the numerical results of acoustic wave propagation characteristics of fluidfilled pipes in infinite fluid. Greenspon [17] presented the axisymmetric vibration of thickwall and thinwalled liquidfilled pipes in water medium. Long et al. [18] put forward a model of acoustic velocity dispersion in the process of acoustic vibration signal propagation and verified by experiments. Zhang, et al. [19] proposed a calculation model for sound velocity under different pipeline embedding conditions. Muggleton et al. [20,20,21,22] analysed the propagation characteristics of fluiddominated axisymmetric waves (s = 1, n = 0) in filled buried pipes. Gao et al. [23, 24] developed a general expression for the fluiddominated wavenumber in a thinwalled fluidfilled pipe surrounded by a layered elastic soil, and the influence of load effect on elastic medium around pipeline is considered. Kalkowski et al. [25] present a multiwave model for propagation in axisymmetric fluidfilled waveguides based on the semianalytical finite elements. Yan et al. [26] developed an experimental investigation for mapping and locating pipe leakage employing the image fusion of ground surface vibration.
Current research studies reveal that at low frequencies, the fluiddominated axisymmetric wave is not only the main carrying waveform of the vibration energy within the buried fluidfilled pipe, but also is an effective signal component which can be used for pipe leakage inspection. This waveform corresponds to the breathing mode of the pipeline, and the current researches on the problem are mainly focused on the metal pipeline. Due to the flexibility of the plastic pipe, the coupling between the pipe and the surrounding medium (mainly soil) is significant, making the influence of the acoustic wave propagation speed and the damping characteristics of the surrounding medium on the energy attenuation more complicated. However, such coupling effect has not been properly addressed in the past; especially the actual contact strength of the pipemedium interface cannot be considered. With the largescale use of plastic pipes and the frequent leakage hazards in China’s urbanisation construction, it is urgent to carry out related research to avoid unnecessary costs.
In this paper, the coupling vibration equation of “soilpipefluid” is derived in detail, the acoustic wave propagation characteristic model of the buried pipeline is established, and the shear effect of the medium outside the pipe and the shear effect of the interface between the pipe and the medium on the axisymmetric wave of the fluid dominant are discussed.
2 Differential Equations of Motion of the MediumPipeFluid System
2.1 Free Motion Equation of FluidFilled Pipe
In this section, the coupled motion equations of fluid dominant axisymmetric waves in a buried fluidfilled pipes are deduced based on the motion equations of the fluidfilled pipe in vacuum [10]. The soil medium around the pipes is regarded as a homogeneous and isotropic elastic medium which allows both compression wave and shear wave to propagate. According to the current research, the s = 1 wave is usually the main carrier of energy in the leakage signal therefore of most interest, and the dynamic damping effect of the pipeline is neglected. Figure 1 shows the cylindrical coordinates of pipes, where u, v, w are the shell displacements in the axial (x), circumferential (θ), and radial (r) directions, respectively. a and h are the pipe radius and the wall thickness respectively and is assumed. The internal fluid is assumed to be inviscid, and both the surrounding medium and internal fluid are assumed to be lossless.
For axisymmetric waves (n = 0), the rotational motion of the pipe can be neglected, so the circumferential displacement and shear stress are both set to zero, freemotion equation of fluidfilled pipe can be described simply according to DonnellMushtari shell equation [27] as follows:
where \(A_{11} = \frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial x^{2} }}  \frac{{\rho_{p} (1  \nu_{p}^{2} )}}{{E_{p} }}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial t^{2} }}\); \(A_{13} = \frac{{\nu_{p} }}{a}\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\); \(A_{13} = A_{31}\); \(A_{33} = \frac{1}{{a^{2} }} + \delta^{2} a^{2} \frac{{\partial^{4} }}{{\partial x^{4} }} + \frac{{\rho_{p} (1  \nu_{p}^{2} )}}{{E_{p} }}\frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial t^{2} }}\). Here, \(\rho_{p} , \, E_{p} , \, \nu_{p}\) are the density, Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio of the pipe; \(\delta\) is the stiffness factor, \(\delta^{2} = h^{2} /12a^{2}\); \(p_{f} (a)\) is the internal pressure at fluid pipe interface.
2.2 Motion Equation of Soil Medium
The displacement of soil medium in all directions can be present as \({\varvec{u}}(x,\;r,\;\theta ,\;t)\). For axisymmetric motion, the torsional displacement can be ignored, then \(u_{\theta } = 0\). Travelling wave solutions for the surrounding medium may be assumed of the form:
where \(W_{m}\), \(U_{m}\) are the amplitude in radial and axial motion of soil medium, which are the functions of radius r.
In the column coordinate system, the expansion process of soil medium can be expressed as
where \(\partial /\partial_{\theta } = 0\). So, the rotating components of soil medium in the axial and radial direction can also be ignored. The rotating component in the direction \(\theta\) is
Substituting for \(u_{r}\) and \(u_{x}\) from Eq. (2) into Eqs. (3) and (4) gives
According to stresses waves in solids [28], the displacement of a point in the soil medium satisfies the equation of motion
where \(\lambda_{m} ,\;\mu_{m}\) are lame coefficients; \(\rho_{m}\) is the density of the medium; \(\nabla\) is the Hamilton differential operator.
The motion equation of soil medium can be obtained by combining Eqs. (2)‒(6)
where \(k_{ds}^{r} , \, k_{rs}^{r}\) are the compression and shear wavenumbers of soil in radial direction respectively, which can be expressed by compressed wavenumber \(k_{d}^{{}}\), shear wavenumber \(k_{r}^{{}}\) and wavenumber in axil direction \(k_{s}^{{}}\) as follows:
where
Equation of motion shown in Eq. (7) can be expressed as the Bessel equation of cylindrical space outside the pipe
where \(G,H\) are the functions of coordinate in the axial (x) and time (t). \(H_{0} ( \cdot ),\;H_{1} ( \cdot )\) are the Hankel functions of the second kind which describe outgoing waves.
In order to satisfy Eqs. (5) and (9), \(U_{m} , \, W_{m}\) must have the form [24]
where \(A_{m} , \, B_{m}\) are constants.Substituting Eq. (2) into Eq. (10) gives
where \(\bf {\varvec{ T}}_{1} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {  ik_{s} H_{0} (k_{ds}^{r} r)} & {i(k_{rs}^{r} )^{2} H_{0} (k_{rs}^{r} r)} \\ {k_{ds}^{r} H^{\prime}_{0} (k_{ds}^{r} r)} & {k_{s} H^{\prime}_{0} (k_{rs}^{r} r)} \\ \end{array} } \right],\) \(H_{0}^{\prime } (\chi ) = \frac{\partial }{\partial \chi }H_{0} (\chi )\).
According to Hook’s law, the relationship between stress and strain in the surrounding medium is
Substituting Eq. (11) into Eq. (12) gives
where \(\bf {\varvec{ T}}_{2} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {  2i\mu_{m} k_{s} k_{ds}^{r} H^{\prime}_{0} (k_{ds}^{r} r)} & {i\mu_{m} (2k_{s}^{2}  k_{r}^{2} )H_{1} (k_{rs}^{r} r)} \\ {2\mu_{m} (k_{ds}^{r} )^{2} H^{\prime\prime}_{0} (k_{ds}^{r} r)  \lambda_{m} k_{d}^{2} H_{0} (k_{ds}^{r} r)} & {  2\mu_{m} k_{s} k_{rs}^{r} H_{1} (k_{rs}^{r} r)} \\ \end{array} } \right],\)\(H^{\prime\prime}_{0} (\chi ) = \frac{{\partial^{2} }}{{\partial \chi^{2} }}H_{0} (\chi ).\)Combining Eqs. (10) and (12) and eliminating the potential coefficients \(A_{m}, B_{m}\), the relationship between stress and displacement can be expressed by
where \({\varvec{ T}} = {\varvec{ T}}_{2}{\varvec{ T}}_{1}^{  1}\).
2.3 Coupling Motion Equations of PipeMedium
When single axisymmetric waves are considered, the load distribution at the pipemedium interface is shown in Figure 2. It assumes that the pipe and medium are in constant contact during the course of movement, the radial displacement of the surrounding medium at the pipe interface is assumed the same as that of the pipewall, u_{r} = w. The contact stress of pipe and medium in the radial direction are considered as identical, which expressed as \(\tilde{\sigma }_{rr}\). The frictional stress along the pipe surface equals the shear stress in the axial direction, which expressed as \(\tau_{x}\). The coupled motion equations given by Eq. (1) can be written as
According to DonnellMushtari shell equation [29], the displacement of pipe can be expressed
Substituting Eq. (16) into Eq. (15) gives
where \(\Omega\) is the nondimensional frequency, \(\Omega = \omega a/c_{L} = k_{L} a\); \(c_{L}\) is the shell compressional wave speed; \(k_{L}\) is the shell compressional wavenumber, \(k_{L}^{2} = \omega^{2} \rho_{p} (1  \nu_{p}^{2} )/E_{p}\). For a thinwalled pipe \(h/a \ll 1\), so \(\delta^{2} (k_{s} a)^{4}\) is very small to be ignored. Then, the displacement of the shell can be solved by the pressure in the pipe \(p_{f} (a)\), the shear force between the pipe and the soil \(\tau_{x}\) and the compressive stress between the pipe and the soil \(\tilde{\sigma }_{rr}\).
According to Ref. [10], for the liquid cannot withstand shear force, the liquid pressure inside the pipe can be expressed directly as the normal displacement of the pipe wall:
where \(k_{fs}^{r}\) is the internal fluid radial wavenumber which can be expressed \((k_{fs}^{r} )^{2} = k_{f}^{2}  k_{s}^{2}\), here, \(k_{f} = \omega /c_{f}\) is the fluid wavenumber and \(c_{f} = \sqrt {B_{f} /\rho_{f} }\) is the freefield fluid wavespeed; \(B_{f}\) is the bulk modulus and \(\rho_{f}\) is the density of the internal fluid; \(J_{0}^{{}}\) is a Bessel function of order zero; \(J^{\prime}_{0} = (\partial /\partial \chi )J_{0} (\chi )\).
It is challenging to give a more realistic coupling equation between soil and pipeline because of the complexity of soil properties. Pipeline and soil are usually defined as two extreme conditions, lubrication contact and compact contact to solve the wavenumber [22]. The actual boundary at pipesoil interface is not both but a transient state. In recent studies, contact coefficients \(\xi \in [0,1]\) have been used to characterize this uncertain coupling relationship. \(\xi = 1\) represents compact contact and \(\xi = 0\) represents lubrication contact, then at the pipe soil interface \(\xi u = u_{x}\) \(w = u_{r}\). The force at the interface of the pipe and soil shown by Eq. (14) may be expressed separately by the displacement of the pipe,
Substituting Eqs. (18) and (19) into Eq. (17) to eliminate the sine term \(\exp (i(\omega t  k_{s} x))\), The axisymmetric s wave coupled equations of motion can be obtained for the buried fluidfilled pipe, as
Solving Eq. (20) can be obtained
The fluid loading term, FL [11] and the surrounding medium loading matrix, SL, are given by
then Eq. (21) can be written in a simple form
3 Wave Characteristic
For the s=1 wavenumber in buried fluidfilled pipes, \(k_{1}^{2} \gg k_{L}^{2}\), so \((k_{1} a)^{2} \gg \Omega^{2}\). When the frequency is low, \(k_{fs}^{r} \to 0\). According to the properties of Bessel functions, \(\chi \to 0\), \(\frac{{J_{0} (\chi )}}{{J_{0}^{\prime } (\chi )}} \approx  \frac{2}{\chi }\). Then the fluid loading term, FL, can be simplified as
Substituting Eq. (25) into Eq. (24) gives
where,
where \(\alpha\) stands for the surrounding medium loading and pipe parameters which can be used to evaluate the influence of soil load on the pipe wall displacement. \(\beta\) refers to fluid and pipe parameters which can be used to evaluate the influence of fluid load on the pipe wall displacement. By means of a complex modulus of elasticity Ep (\(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) always complex), it is found from Eq. (26) that k_{1} is always complex indicating the s = 1 wave decays as it propagates. Then \(\alpha\) and \(\beta\) are described as the measures of the loading effects of surrounding medium and fluid on the pipe wall respectively. By Eq. (27), \(\beta\) can be obtained directly, but \(\alpha\) which is related to the unknown wavenumber k_{1} cannot be solved directly. When the pipe is placed in a different medium, the equations can be simplified by boundary conditions.
3.1 Lubrication Contact of PipeMedium
On the condition of lubrication contact, the contact coefficient \(\xi = 0\), the measure of the loading effects of the surrounding medium \(\alpha =  \nu_{p}^{2}  SL_{22}  i\nu_{p} SL_{12} /k_{1} a\), then Eq. (24) can be written as
It can be seen from Eq. (28) that the propagation of k_{1} wave will be delayed as it propagates caused by the effect of the pipe wall (i.e., a complex \(\beta\)) and additional damping of the surrounding medium (i.e., a complex \(\alpha\)), although there is no frictional damping between pipe and surrounding medium.
3.2 Pipe in NonViscous Liquids
For nonviscous liquids, the shear modulus \(\mu_{m} = 0\), contact coefficient \(\xi = 0\), as a result, the lame coefficient \(\lambda_{m} = B_{m}\), the shear wavenumber \(k_{r} \to \infty\), and \(\mu_{m} k_{r}^{2} = \omega^{2} \rho_{m}\). Then the surrounding medium loading matrix SL can be simplified as \(SL_{11} = SL_{12} = 0\). In this case, the measure of the loading effects of the surrounding fluid reduces to \(\alpha =  \nu_{p}^{2}  SL_{22}\). Eq. (24) can be rewritten as
where \(SL_{22} =  \frac{{\rho_{m} }}{{\rho_{p} }}\frac{{a^{2} }}{h}\frac{{k_{L}^{2} }}{{k_{d1}^{r} }}\frac{{H_{0} (k_{d1}^{r} a)}}{{H^{\prime}_{0} (k_{d1}^{r} a)}}\). Since \(SL_{22}\) is a function of the complex k_{1}, \(\alpha\) is a complex value. So, s_{1} wave attenuation is attributed to both material losses along the pipe wall (i.e., a complex \(\beta\)) and radiation losses due to the added damping of the surrounding medium (i.e., a complex α).
3.3 Pie in Air
For an air medium, the loading effects of air on the pipe wall can be neglected, the contact coefficient is considered zero. Then, T = 0, SL = 0, and \(\alpha =  \nu_{p}^{2}\). Eq. (24) can be expressed are consistent with Ref. [13]:
At low frequency, \(\Omega^{2} \ll 1\), and \({\text{Re}} (\beta ) \gg 1\), then \(k_{1}^{2} > k_{f}^{2}\). And that means the wave speed of the s = 1 wave will be significantly lower than that of the free wave. In Eq. (30), the imaginary part only exists in \(\beta\), so the wave attenuation is only due to losses within the pipe wall.
Compared to the equation from Eq. (26) to Eq. (30), it can be seen that, if the real part of \(\alpha\) less than zero, \({\text{Re}}(\alpha ) < 0\), external loads of surrounding medium act as additional mass, and the wavenumber will increase compared to the inair value; Contrarily, if the real part of \(\alpha\) more than zero, \({\text{Re}}(\alpha ) > 0\), external loads of surrounding medium act as additional stiffness, and the wavenumber will decrease relative to the inair case.
4 Numerical Results and Discussions
4.1 Numerical Method
This section presents some numerical results of the shear effect on s = 1 wavenumber. The real part k_{re} and imaginary part k_{im} of k_{1} are set as variables and the Eq. (24) is described as a target function
The NeldesMead method [30] is used to solve Eq. (31). In the optimization progress, the termination condition is set as
where n is the iterations, \(\overline{k}_{re} , \, \overline{k}_{im}\) are the centre of the simplex in the current step, \(\varepsilon\) is the tolerance.In the calculation process, the derivative of Bessel function can be deal based on its property.
For the arguments of the Bessel or Hankel functions are derived from the square root, it is important to choose the sign of the root. The method to choose the sign of the root in Ref. [24] is be used. If the real part is larger, the partial wave can be considered homogeneous and must propagate away from the shell, so the positive square root is chosen. On the other hand, if the imaginary part is larger, the partial wave can be considered inhomogeneous and must decay away from the shell, so the negative square root is selected.
The material properties of the fluid, pipe and surrounding medium are shown in Table 1. Considering the efficiency and convergence, the wavenumbers are calculated up to 1 Hz. The thickness/radius ratio of pipe is 0.125, and the plate compressional wave speed is 1725 m/s.
Considering the previous analysis, the shear effect of surrounding medium and shear effect of pipemedium interface both affect the wave propagation and attenuation characteristics. This section presents some numerical sample to discuss the influence of the shear effects. The attenuations are defined by the loss in dB per unit propagation distance by
4.2 Shear Effect of Surrounding Medium
Some numerical results are shown in this section to explain the influence of the shear effect of surrounding medium. In order to eliminate the effects of surrounding medium and pipe interface friction, the “lubrication contact” assume is used here. Figure 3 gives the wavenumber for the soil with different shear modulus. It can be seen that from Figure 3, as the previous theoretical analysis, the effect of the pipe and surrounding medium is used to substantially increase the real part of the s = 1 wavenumber from the freefield value k_{f} . This solution is similar to Ref. [24]. As the shear effect of the surrounding medium increased, the real part of the wavenumber gradually decreased. The overall loading influences of the surrounding medium are to add mass to the pipe wall, but the shear effect is to add stiffness, and additional stiffness increases with the increase of the shear effect of surrounding medium.
Figure 4 shows the loss in dB per unit propagation distance. Compared with the attenuation in vacuo, the radiation into the surrounding medium is significantly used for much larger attenuation. The attenuation is more serious in the highfrequency range. In fact, at the lower frequency range, the attenuation dominated by losses within the pipe, as the shear effects increased, the attenuation slightly decreased. At higher frequencies, radiation as both compressional waves and shear waves contributes to the attenuation, and then the attenuation increased with the shear effects increased. So the shear effects of surrounding medium should not be neglected in leak detection of buried pipeline.
In order to better understand the shear effects of surrounding medium on dispersive behaviour of s=1 wave, the real and imaginary parts of the measure \(\alpha\) are given in Figures 5 and 6 respectively. As shown in these figures, the level of \({\text{Re(}}\alpha {)}\) is much larger than \({\text{Im(}}\alpha {)}\), thus \({\text{Re(}}\alpha {)}\) plays a dominant role in the overall loading effects of surrounding medium on the propagation characteristics. As mentioned above, a negative \({\text{Re(}}\alpha {)}\) indicates that the surrounding medium is to add mass to the pipe wall and the propagation wavenumber will be increased. With the increase of the shear effects, \({\text{Re(}}\alpha {)}\) increased and slightly larger than the value in vacuo, thus the shear effects of surrounding medium have some impact on the propagation characteristics of s = 1 wave. Additionally, it can be noted that \({\text{Re(}}\beta {)}\) (\({\text{Re(}}\beta {)}\) = 0.58) is much larger than \({\text{Re(}}\alpha {)}\), which shows the fluid loading dominants the vibration of the pipe wall for plastic pipe, so more attention should be paid to fluid load wave in leak detection.
4.3 Shear Effects at the Pipe/Medium Interface
The shear effects at the pipe/medium interface exist in buried pipe systems, but it is normally ignored because the coupling relationship between pipes and surrounding medium is not clear. Figure 7 and Figure 8 show the wavenumber for s = 1 wave with different contact coefficients. In calculation, the shear wave speed of surrounding medium is set to 300 m/s.
As shown in Figure 7, the real part of wavenumber for s = 1 wave much larger than the freefield value k_{f} with different contact coefficients. Whether the shear effect of the interface between surrounding medium and pipe wall has a great influence on the real part at high frequency (k_{f}a > 0.09). Once these shear effects are included, the influence of the contact coefficient on the real part is mainly reflected in the middle frequency band (\(k_{f} a \in (0.02,0.09)\)). In Figure 8, it can be seen that with the consideration of the shear effect of the interface, more waves can be radiated into the surrounding medium. The attenuation increased as the frequency increased, and has a local peak in the middle frequency band. The frequency corresponding to these peaks increased with the contact coefficient increased. The local peak of attenuation is caused by the resonance between the additional mass of the surrounding medium and the pipe wall, resulting in a dramatic increase in the wave intensity of radiation to the surrounding medium. At the high frequency, the friction force between surrounding medium and pipe wall seems not enough for surrounding medium to vibrate with the pipe wall, so the results of attenuation gradually approaching the value in the case of lubrication contact.
In engineering applications, the actual wave number and attenuation should be obtained according to the actual pipesoil coupling situation, and the delay estimation should be carried out according to the leakage signal dispersion in order to obtain the accurate leakage location results. Medium and lowfrequency signal is generally be used, and the contact coefficient which has a certain influence on the propagation characteristics of the wave in this frequency band should not be ignored.
4.4 Field Test
This section presents some numerical results of wavenumber from actual plastics water pipes. Two field tests were carried out for pipes in different buried environments. The details of the experimental setup and analysis for test 1 can be found in Refs. [21, 24]. The test 2 selected the water supply network in Southwest Jiaotong University, the sensor is set in the pipe well, and fire hydrant discharge signal as leakage signal. The distance from pipe well to hydrant discharge is 12 m. The soil and pipe coupling parameters cannot be obtained in both tests, the theoretical calculation and experimental comparison are not presented in this paper.
Figures 9 and 10 show the real and the imaginary components of the measured and fitting wavenumbers. Due to the different buried environments of pipes in the two tests, both the real and imaginary components of the measured wavenumbers are large different. There are some reflections from pipe connections blow 160 Hz which cause some fluctuations at the corresponding frequency. At the high frequency the measured data becomes unreliable due to the noise interference. Experimental measurements show good agreement on the trend of the wavenumbers with predictions in Figures 7 and 8. Due to the shear effects at the pipe/medium interface, the attenuations have a local peak (about 700 Hz in test 1 and 320 Hz in test 2), which consistent with the present predictions.
5 Conclusions

(1)
Axisymmetric waves in thinwalled fluidfilled plastic pipe surrounded by an infinite elastic medium which can sustain both longitudinal and shear waves have been studied. The contact coefficient has been introduced to describe the contact strength of pipe and surrounding medium. Then a general expression for the fluiddominated wavenumber has been presented in buried fluidfilled plastic pipe.

(2)
For axisymmetric waves, the fluid loading dominates the vibration of the plastic pipe wall. The overall loading effects of the surrounding medium are to add mass to the pipe wall, but the shear effect is to add stiffness, which increases with the shear effect of surrounding medium. The shear effect of the surrounding medium also influences the attenuation of the wave.

(3)
The added mass of the surrounding medium will resonate with the pipe wall at a specific frequency under the shear effects at the pipe/medium interface, resulting in the change of the propagation characteristics of the wave near the frequency. At higher frequency, the influence of shear effects at the interface on the propagation characteristics is not obvious. The wavenumber can be solved by compact contact theory and the attenuation will approximate the lubricating contact state with the frequency increases.
References
H Fuchs, R Riehle. Ten years of experience with leak detection by acoustic signal analysis. Applied Acoustics, 1991, 33: 1–19.
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan, P W Linford. Wavenumber prediction of waves in buried pipes for water leak detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 249: 939–954.
O Hunaidi, A Wang. A new system for locating leaks in urban water distribution pipes. Management of Environmental Quality, 2006, 7(4): 450–466.
Y Gao, M J Brennan, P F Joseph. A comparison of time delay estimators for the detection of leak noise signals in plastic water distribution pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2006, 292: 552–570.
J Wang, L Zhao, T Liu, et al. Novel negative pressure wavebased pipeline leak detection system using fiber bragg gratingbased pressure sensors. Journal of Lightwave Technology, 2017, 35(16): 3366–3373.
J Hong, W Song. Deltamodulated crosscorrelation method for delay estimation on source localization. Asiapacific Signal and Information Processing Association Annual Summit and Conference, 2017: 1516–1519.
K S Ng, P Y Chen, Y C Tseng. A design of automatic water leak detection device. Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Optoelectronic Information Processing, Singapore July 79, 2017: 70–73.
Y Ma, Y Gao, X Cui, et al. Adaptive phase transform method for pipeline leakage detection. Sensors, 2019, 19: 310.
M J Brennan, Y Gao, P F Joseph. On the relationship between time and frequency domain methods in time delay estimation for leak detection in water distribution pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2007, 304: 213–223.
C R Fuller, F J Fahy. Characteristics of wavepropagation and energy distributions in cylindrical elastic shells filled with fluid. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1982, 81: 501–518.
C R Fuller. The input mobility of an infinite circular cylindrical elastic shell filled with fluid. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1983, 87: 409–427.
M Xu, W Zhang. Vibrational power flow input and transmission in a circular cylindrical shell filled with fluid. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2000, 234: 387–403.
R J Pinnington, A R Briscoe. Externally applied sensor for axisymmetric waves in fluidfilled pipe. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1994, 173(4): 503–516.
R J Pinnington. The axisymmetric wave transmission properties of pressurized flexible tubes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 204: 271–289.
R J Pinnington. Axisymmetric wave transfer functions of flexible tubes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 1997, 204: 291–310.
B K Sinha, T J Plona, S Kostek, et al. Axisymmetric wave propagation in fluidloaded cylindrical shells. I: theory. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1992: 1132.
J E Greenspon. Vibrations of thick and thin cylindrical shells surrounded by water. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1961, 33: 1321.
R Long, P Cawley, M J S Lowe. Acoustic wave propagation in buried iron water pipes. Proc Royal Soc Lond: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2003, 459: 2749–2770.
J Zhang, L Jia, Y Shu, Wave propagation characteristics of the shells of revolution by frequency wave number spectrum method. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 251(2): 367–372.
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan, R J Pinnington. Wavenumber prediction of waves in buried pipes for water leak detection. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2002, 249: 939–54.
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan, P W Linford. Axisymmetric wave propagation in fluidfilled pipes: Wavenumber measurements in vacuo and buried pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2004, 270: 171–190.
J M Muggleton, J Yan. Wavenumber prediction and measurement of axisymmetric waves in buried fluidfilled pipes: Inclusion of shear coupling at a lubricated pipe/soil interface. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332: 1216–1230.
Y Gao, F Sui, J M Muggleton, et al. Simplified dispersion relationships for fluiddominated axisymmetric wave motion in buried fluidfilled pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2016, 375: 386–402.
Y Gao, Y Liu, J M Muggleton. Axisymmetric fluiddominated wave in fluidfilled plastic pipes: Loading effects of surrounding elastic medium. Applied Acoustics, 2017, 116: 43–49.
M K Kalkowski, J M Muggleton, E Rustighi. Axisymetric semianalytical finite elements for modeling waves in buried/submerged fluidfilled waveguides. Computer and Structures, 2018, 196: 327–340.
S Yan, H Yang, Y Gao, et al. On image fusion of ground surface vibration for mapping and locating underground pipeline leakage: An experimental investigation. Sensors, 2020: 1–20.
A W Leissa. Vibration of Shells, NASA SSP288, Washington DC: US Government Printing Office, 1973.
W M Ewing, W S Jardetzky, F Press. Elastic waves in layered media. New York: McGrawHill, 1957.
M C Junger, D Feit Sound. Structures and Their Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge Press, 1972.
B Xue, D Cui, L Li, et al. Parallel inverse design method of wheel profile. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2013, 49(16): 8–16. (in Chinese)
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Funding
Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11774378).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
PL was in charge of the whole trial and wrote the manuscript; XS gave valuable advice on the research plan; YG and RW assisted with sampling and laboratory analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Authors’ Information
Ping Lu, born in 1982, is currently a PhD candidate at State Key Laboratory of Traction Power, Southwest Jiaotong University, China. He received his master degree on Bridge and Tunnel Engineering from Chongqing University, China, in 2008. His research interests include sound and vibration.
Xiaozhen Sheng, born in 1962, is currently a professor at School of Urban Railway Transportation, Shanghai University of Engineering Science, China. He received his doctor degree on sound and vibration from Southampton University, UK, in 2001.
Yan Gao, born in 1976, is currently a professor at Key Laboratory of Noise and Vibration Research, Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China. She received her doctor degree on sound and vibration in Southampton University, UK, in 2006.
Ruichen Wang, born in 1989, is currently a researcher at Institute of Railway Research, University of Huddersfield, UK. He received his doctor degree on vehicle engineering from University of Huddersfield, UK, in 2016.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Lu, P., Sheng, X., Gao, Y. et al. Influence of Shear Effects on the Characteristics of Axisymmetric Wave Propagation in a Buried FluidFilled Pipe. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 35, 74 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033022007107
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10033022007107