U Baroudi, A A Al-Roubaiey, A Devendiran. Pipeline leak detection systems and data fusion: A survey. IEEE Access, 2019, 7: 97426-97439.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Zhang, S Huang, W Zhao, et al. Electromagnetic ultrasonic guided wave long-term monitoring and data difference adaptive extraction method for buried oil-gas pipelines. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 2017, 54(3): 329-339.
Article
Google Scholar
T Wang, J Cao, L Pei. A novel underground pipeline surveillance system based on hybrid acoustic features. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2020, 21(2): 1040-1050.
Article
Google Scholar
T S T Amran, M S M Amin, M R Ahmad, et al. A study on detection water leakage of underground metal and PVC pipes using ground penetrating radar. International Nuclear Science Technology and Engineering Conference, Skudai, Malaysia, November 23-25, 2018, 555(1): 012012.
R Khademi-Zahedi. Application of the finite element method for evaluating the stress distribution in buried damaged polyethylene gas pipes. Underground Space, 2019, 4(1): 59-71.
Article
Google Scholar
H Lu, J Matthews, T Iseley. How does trenchless technology make pipeline construction greener? A comprehensive carbon footprint and energy consumption analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020: 121215.
H R Vanaei, A Eslami, A Egbewande. A review on pipeline corrosion, in-line inspection (ILI), and corrosion growth rate models. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, 2017, 149: 43-54.
Article
Google Scholar
M Karami. Review of corrosion role in gas pipeline and some methods for preventing it. Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, 2012, 134(5): 1-5.
Article
Google Scholar
B Hu, R Yu, J Liu. Experimental study on the corrosion testing of a buried metal pipeline by transient electromagnetic method. Anti-Corrosion Methods and Materials, 2016, 63(4): 262-268.
Article
Google Scholar
Q Feng, R Li, B Nie, et al. Literature review: Theory and application of in-line inspection technologies for oil and gas pipeline girth weld defection. Sensors, 2017, 17(1): 50.
Google Scholar
Z Long, W Wei, A Turlapaty, et al. Fusion of radiation and electromagnetic induction data for buried radioactive target detection and characterization. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 2013, 60(2): 1126-1133.
Article
Google Scholar
B A Sundaram, K Kesavan, S Parivallal. Recent advances in health monitoring and assessment of in-service oil and gas buried pipelines. Journal of The Institution of Engineers (India): Series A, 2018, 99(4): 729-740.
M A Volosova, A A Okunkova, S V Fedorov, et al. Electrical discharge machining non-conductive ceramics: combination of materials. Technologies, 2020, 8(2): 32.
Article
Google Scholar
S Datta, S Sarkar. A review on different pipeline fault detection methods. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2016, 41: 97-106.
Article
Google Scholar
I Galili, D Kaplan, Y Lehavi. Teaching Faraday’s law of electromagnetic induction in an introductory physics course. American Journal of Physics, 2006, 74(4): 337-343.
Article
Google Scholar
V Chandrasekar, H Chen, H Tan, et al. Rainfall estimation from ground radar and TRMM Precipitation Radar using hybrid deep neural networks. Geophysical Research Letters, 2019, 46(17-18): 10669-10678.
Google Scholar
Y Zhang, J Shi. Design of polyethylene ventilation pipeline leakage monitoring system based on fusion of multiple signal sources. Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, 440(2): 022107.
L Shao, Y M Zhang, J Li, et al. Research on high temperature region segmentation of infrared pipeline image based on improved two-dimensional-Otsu. Spectroscopy and Spectral Analysis, 2019, 39(5): 1637-1642.
Google Scholar
A L Balogun, A N Matori, A I Hamid-Mosaku, et al. Fuzzy MCDM-based GIS model for subsea oil pipeline route optimization: An integrated approach. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 2017, 35(7): 961-969.
Article
Google Scholar
Radiodetection Ltd. ABC& XYZ of locating buried pipes and cables for the beginner and the specialist. UK: Radiodetection Ltd, 2008.
C H Xu, H B Zhu, N F Zhu. Tracer wire in non-metallic pipeline detection. Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2011, (01): 159-163. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
F L H Cavalcante, C Schamper, C Noel, et al. Geometrical characterization of urban fill by integrating the multi‐receiver electromagnetic induction method and electrical resistivity tomography: A case study in Poitiers, France. European Journal of Soil Science, 2019, 70(5): 1012-1024.
Google Scholar
Y Chen, B Z Wang. Four-domain dual-combination operation invariance and time reversal symmetry of electromagnetic fields. Optics Express, 2013, 21(21): 24702-24710.
Article
Google Scholar
G E Qady, M Metwaly, A Khozaym. Tracing buried pipelines using multi frequency electromagnetic. NRIAG Journal of Astronomy and Geophysics, 2014, 3(1): 101-107.
Article
Google Scholar
Z F Cao. Tracer line method of gas pe pipelines and its detection technique. Site Investigation Science and Technology, 2010(04): 61-64. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
D Ambruš, D Vasić, V Bilas. Robust estimation of metal target shape using time-domain electromagnetic induction data. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2016, 65(4): 795-807.
Article
Google Scholar
L Ma, H Y Wei, M Soleimani. Pipelines inspection using magnetic induction tomography based on a narrowband pass filtering method. Progress in Electromagnetics Research, 2012, 23: 65-78.
Article
Google Scholar
P Chen. CJJ 61-2017 Technical specification for urban underground pipeline detection. Beijing: Beijing Surveying and Mapping Technology Design and Research Institute, 2017. (in Chinese)
F A Karaa, A Katz, E Niver. Decision analysis of preferred methods for locating underground conduits. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2014, 5(2): 04013017.
Article
Google Scholar
S Rudolph, B P Marchant, L Weihermüller, et al. Assessment of the position accuracy of a single-frequency GPS receiver designed for electromagnetic induction surveys. Precision Agriculture, 2019, 20(1): 19-39.
Article
Google Scholar
H Wang, Q Zhu, Z Ding, et al. A fully-packaged ship-shaped hybrid nanogenerator for blue energy harvesting toward seawater self-desalination and self-powered positioning. Nano Energy, 2019, 57: 616-624.
Article
Google Scholar
D Mishra, K K Agrawal, A Abbas, et al. PIG [Pipe Inspection Gauge]: An artificial dustman for cross country pipelines. Procedia Computer Science, 2019, 152: 333-340.
Article
Google Scholar
B Uslu, Y J Jung, S K Sinha. Underground utility locating technologies for condition assessment and renewal engineering of water pipeline infrastructure systems. Journal of Pipeline Systems Engineering and Practice, 2016, 7(4): 04016011.
Article
Google Scholar
L L Chen. Application of tracer method in underground pipeline exploration under complicated conditions. Science and Technology of West China, 2011, 10(25): 22-23. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
J Dexmer, C M Leroy, L Binet, et al. Vanadium Oxide− PANI nanocomposite-based macroscopic fibers: 1d alcohol sensors bearing enhanced toughness. Chemistry of Materials, 2008, 20(17): 5541-5549.
Article
Google Scholar
S Roshani, M Hayati, S Setayeshi, et al. A miniaturized harmonic suppressed power amplifier integrated with lowpass filter for long term evolution application. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 2016, 89(1): 197-204.
Article
Google Scholar
S Miura, T Nakagami, V Parque, et al. Bi-rigid guide wire enables endoscope insertion into winding small gas pipelines. Mechanical Engineering Journal, 2020, 7(4):20-00088.
Article
Google Scholar
H M Kim, H R Yoo, G S Park. A new design of MFL sensors for self-driving NDT robot to avoid getting stuck in curved underground pipelines. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2018, 54(11): 1-5.
Google Scholar
M Starý, F Novotný, M Horák, et al. Sampling robot for primary circuit pipelines of decommissioned nuclear facilities. Automation in Construction, 2020, 119: 103303.
M P Matos, M von Sperling, A T Matos, et al. Clogging in constructed wetlands: Indirect estimation of medium porosity by analysis of ground-penetrating radar images. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, 676: 333-342.
Article
Google Scholar
L Langhammer, L Rabenstein, A Bauder, et al. Ground-penetrating radar antenna orientation effects on temperate mountain glaciers. Geophysics, 2017, 82(3): H15-H24.
Article
Google Scholar
J Kavi, U B Halabe, H V S GangaRao. Detection of buried FRP composite pipes using ground penetrating radar. Journal of Multidisciplinary Engineering Science and Technology, 2020, 6(7): 10479-10484.
Google Scholar
Q Hoarau, G Ginolhac, A M Atto, et al. Robust adaptive detection of buried pipes using GPR. Signal Processing, 2017, 132: 293-305.
Article
Google Scholar
R Salvi, A Ramdasi, Y A Kolekar, et al. Use of ground-penetrating radar (GPR) as an effective tool in assessing pavements—A review. Geotechnics for Transportation Infrastructure, 2019: 85-95.
X Zeng, G A McMechan. GPR characterization of buried tanks and pipes. Geophysics, 1997, 62(3): 797-806.
Article
Google Scholar
A Shaari, R S Ahmad, T H Chew. Effects of antenna-target polarization and target-medium dielectric contrast on GPR signal from non-metal pipes using FDTD simulation. NDT & E International, 2010, 43(5): 403-408.
Article
Google Scholar
E Yigit, S Demirci, C Ozdemir, et al. A synthetic aperture radar‐based focusing algorithm for B‐scan ground penetrating radar imagery. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 2007, 49(10): 2534-2540.
Article
Google Scholar
J Zhou, Y Wang, Q Zhang. Research of geologic radar in anti-sliding piles inspection. 2nd International Conference on Remote Sensing, Environment and Transportation Engineering, Nanjing, China, June 1-3, 2012: 1-4.
X Dou, L J Wei, D R Magee, et al. 3D buried utility location using a marching-cross-section algorithm for multi-sensor data fusion. Sensors, 2016, 16(11): 1-24.
Article
Google Scholar
C Srinivas, T Srinivasarao. Buried pipes detection through ground penetrating radar images. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Technology, 2017, 8(12): 61-68.
Google Scholar
H Harkat, A E Ruano, M G Ruano, et al. GPR target detection using a neural network classifier designed by a multi-objective genetic algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 2019, 79: 310-325.
Article
Google Scholar
J Prinsloo, R Malekian. Accurate vehicle location system using RFID, an internet of things approach. Sensors, 2016, 16(6): 825.
Article
Google Scholar
J Zhang, G Y Tian, A M J Marindra, et al. A review of passive RFID tag antenna-based sensors and systems for structural health monitoring applications. Sensors, 2017, 17(2): 265.
Article
Google Scholar
V Khokhlova, E Delevoye. The localization of buried objects in the soil using an RFID tag: protocol description and parameter estimation with the model of the oscillating magnetic field in media. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 2019, 55(5): 1-16.
Article
Google Scholar
R Vyas, B Tye. A sequential RFID system for robust communication with underground carbon steel pipes in oil and gas applications. Electronics, 2019, 8(12): 1374.
Article
Google Scholar
C Z Wu, XY Wang, M C Chen, et al. Differential received signal strength based RFID positioning for construction equipment tracking. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2019, 42: 100960.
C Sun. Application of RFID technology for logistics on internet of things. AASRI Procedia, 2012, 1: 106-111.
Article
Google Scholar
M H Zarifi, S Deif, M Daneshmand. Wireless passive RFID sensor for pipeline integrity monitoring. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2017, 261: 24-29.
Article
Google Scholar
Y C Lin, W F Cheung, F C Siao. Developing mobile 2D barcode/RFID-based maintenance management system. Automation in Construction, 2014, 37: 110-121.
Article
Google Scholar
N Outteridge. Internet of things security: A review on the RFID contactless security protocols. PeerJ Preprints, 2018. https://peerj.com/preprints/26504/
A Narayanan, S Singh, M Somasekharan. Implementing RFID in library: methodologies, advantages and disadvantages. Recent Advances in Information Technology, 2005, 271.
K Chen , Y Chen, W J Hsueh, et al. The study of an adaptively active control on the acoustic propagation in a pipe. Applied Acoustics, 1998, 55(1): 53-66.
Article
Google Scholar
F C Lobato de Almeida. Improved acoustic methods for leak detection in buried plastic water distribution pipes. Southampton: University of Southampton, 2013.
Google Scholar
S Sazesh, S Shams. Vibration analysis of cantilever pipe conveying fluid under distributed random excitation. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 2019, 87: 84-101.
Article
Google Scholar
Baghalian A, Tahakori S, Fekrmandi H, et al. Implementation of the surface response to excitation method for pipes. Mechanics of Composite and Multi-functional Materials, 2017, 7: 261-266.
Google Scholar
S Tashakori, A Baghalian, M Unal, et al. Contact and non-contact approaches in load monitoring applications using surface response to excitation method. Measurement, 2016, 89: 197-203.
Article
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan, Y Gao. Determining the location of buried plastic water pipes from measurements of ground surface vibration. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2011, 75(1): 54-61.
Article
Google Scholar
A Martini, A Rivola, M Troncossi. Autocorrelation analysis of vibro-acoustic signals measured in a test field for water leak detection. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(12): 2450.
Article
Google Scholar
F C L Almeida, M J Brennan, P F Joseph, et al. Towards an in-situ measurement of wave velocity in buried plastic water distribution pipes for the purposes of leak location. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2015, 359: 40-55.
Article
Google Scholar
H V Fuchs, R Riehle. Ten years of experience with leak detection by acoustic signal analysis. Appl. Acoust., 1991, 33(1): 1-19
Article
Google Scholar
A Katz, F Karaa, E Niver. Innovative and effective techniques for locating underground conduits. New Jersey: University Transportation Research Center, 2011.
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, M Brennan. The use of acoustic methods to detect and locate underground piping systems. The Ninth International Conference on Recent Advances in Structural Dynamics (RASD2006), Southampton, UK, November 17-19, 2006: 1-4.
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan. The design and instrumentation of an experimental rig to investigate acoustic methods for the detection and location of underground piping systems. Applied Acoustics, 2008, 69(11): 1101-1107.
Article
Google Scholar
C Xu. Research on buried non-metallic pipe detection technology based on sound wave propagation characteristics. Huainan: Anhui University of Science and Technology, 2019. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, J Yan. Wavenumber prediction and measurement of axisymmetric waves in buried fluid-filled pipes: Inclusion of shear coupling at a lubricated pipe/soil interface. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2013, 332(5): 1216-1230.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Gao, J M Muggleton, Y Liu, et al. An analytical model of ground surface vibration due to axisymmetric wave motion in buried fluid-filled pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2017, 395: 142-159.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Gao, J M Muggleton, E Rustighi, et al. Ground surface vibration due to axisymmetric wave motion in buried fluid-filled pipes, International Congress on Sound & Vibration, Florence, Italy, July 12-16, 2015: 1-8.
Y Gao, Y Liu, J M Muggleton. Axisymmetric fluid-dominated wave in fluid-filled plastic pipes: Loading effects of surrounding elastic medium. Applied Acoustics, 2017, 116: 43-49.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Gao, F S Sui, J M Muggleton, et al. Simplified dispersion relationships for fluid-dominated axisymmetric wave motion in buried fluid-filled pipes. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 2016, 375: 386-402.
Article
Google Scholar
A Rahaman, C H Park, B Kim. Design and characterization of a MEMS piezoelectric acoustic sensor with the enhanced signal–to–noise ratio. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2020: 112087.
P Arumbu, S Srinivasalu. Sustainable model for high signal to noise ratio to measure underwater acoustic signal using Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2018, 68: 262-270.
Article
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton. Remote tree root mapping using a tree trunk vibration. The ISMA2014 including USD, Leuven, Belgium, September 15-17, 2014: 3807-3818.
M K Kalkowski, J M Muggleton, E Rustighi. Tree root detection from ground surface vibration measurements. The MATEC Web of Conferences, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, March 2–5, 2018: 1-5.
B Papandreou, E Rustighi, M J Brennan. A study into the feasibility of using acoustic techniques to locate buried objects. Southampton: Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, 2008.
Google Scholar
B Papandreou, M J Brennan, E Rustighi. On the detection of objects buried at a shallow depth using seismic wave reflections. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2011, 129(3): 1366-1374.
Article
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, B Papandreou. A shear wave ground surface vibration technique for the detection of buried pipes. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2014, 106: 164-172.
Article
Google Scholar
V Ganji, N Gucunski, A Maher. Detection of underground obstacles by SASW method—Numerical aspects. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 1997, 123(3): 212-219.
Article
Google Scholar
H Dong, J Lai, P Li. Inverse obstacle scattering for elastic waves with Phased or phaseless far-field data. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 2019, 12(2): 809-838.
Article
MathSciNet
Google Scholar
X Tian, W Zhao, Y Du, et al. Detection of mortar defects in ballastless tracks of high-speed railway using transient elastic wave method. Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, 2018, 8(1): 151-160.
Article
Google Scholar
P Shokouhi, N Gucunski, A Maher. Application of wavelets in detection of cavities under pavements by surface waves. Transportation Research Record, 2003, 1860(1): 57-65.
Article
Google Scholar
J Lin, C Zhang, L L Sun, et al. Simulation of seismic wave scattering by embedded cavities in an elastic half-plane using the novel singular boundary method. Advances in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 2018, 10(2): 322-342.
Article
MathSciNet
MATH
Google Scholar
C B Xiong, Z Li, X Sun, et al. Integrated acoustic survey method for inspecting the unburied status of submarine pipeline. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2017, 45(5): 425-431. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
A Van Pamel, G Sha, S I Rokhlin, et al. Finite-element modelling of elastic wave propagation and scattering within heterogeneous media. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 2017, 473(2197): 20160738.
Article
Google Scholar
L Karl, W Haegeman, G Degrande. Determination of the material damping ratio and the shear wave velocity with the Seismic Cone Penetration Test. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 2006, 26(12): 1111-1126.
Article
Google Scholar
T Sugimoto, M Okujima. Underground Imaging Using Shear Waves: Stacking Method of the Reflected Scattered Waves. Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, 1996, 35(4): 3105-3108.
Article
Google Scholar
H A Ocampo, Alfredo. Metodologia para la captura y analisis de ondas sismicas artificiales a partir de hologramas acusticos para la deteccion de objetos relacionados con minas anti persona. Colombia: Metropolitan Institute of Technology, 2014.
L Li, J Tan, D A Wood, et al. A review of the current status of induced seismicity monitoring for hydraulic fracturing in unconventional tight oil and gas reservoirs. Fuel, 2019, 242: 195-210.
Article
Google Scholar
W A Schneider. The common depth point stack. Proceedings of the IEEE, 1984, 72(10): 1238-1254.
Article
Google Scholar
C H Frazier, N Çadallı, J D C Munson, et al. Acoustic imaging of objects buried in soil. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2000, 108(1): 147-156.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Wei, X Shi, Q Liu, et al. The influence of crack modes on the elastic wave propagation characteristics in a non-uniform rotating shaft. Applied Sciences, 2018, 8(11): 2105.
Article
Google Scholar
B Albers. Linear elastic wave propagation in unsaturated sands, silts, loams and clays. Transport in Porous Media, 2011, 86(2): 537-557.
Article
Google Scholar
W C Lo, C L Yeh, C T Tsai. Effect of soil texture on the propagation and attenuation of acoustic wave at unsaturated conditions. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 338(3-4): 273-284.
Article
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, M J Brennan, C D F Rogers, et al. Point vibration measurements for the detection of shallow-buried objects. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 39: 27-33.
Article
Google Scholar
Y Liu, D Habibi, D Chai, et al. A comprehensive review of acoustic methods for locating underground pipeline. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3): 1031.
Article
Google Scholar
J M Muggleton, E Rustighi. ‘Mapping the Underworld’: recent developments in vibro-acoustic techniques to locate buried infrastructure. Géotechnique Letters, 2013, 3(3): 137-141.
Article
Google Scholar
P Zhang, L Zhang, T Wu, et al. Detection and location of fouling on photovoltaic panels using a drone-mounted infrared thermography system. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 2017, 11(1): 016026.
L Wang, Z P Wu, C Chen, et al. Using low altitude thermal infrared remote sensing technique to detect the underground oil pipelines. Science of Surveying and Mapping, 2018, 43(03): 142-147. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
U Netzelmann, G Walle, S Lugin, et al. Induction thermography: principle, applications and first steps towards standardisation. Quantitative InfraRed Thermography Journal, 2016, 13(2): 170-181.
Article
Google Scholar
G Shen, T Li. Infrared thermography for high-temperature pressure pipe. Insight-Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, 2007, 49(3): 151-153.
Article
Google Scholar
P M Bach, J K Kodikara. Reliability of infrared thermography in detecting leaks in buried water reticulation pipes. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2017, 10(9): 4210-4224.
Article
Google Scholar
M H Loke, J E Chambers, D F Rucker, et al. Recent developments in the direct-current geoelectrical imaging method. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2013, 95: 135-156.
Article
Google Scholar
A P Aizebeokhai. 2D and 3D geoelectrical resistivity imaging: Theory and field design. Scientific Research and Essays, 2010, 5(23): 3592-3605.
Google Scholar
E Attias, K Weitemeyer, S Hölz, et al. High-resolution resistivity imaging of marine gas hydrate structures by combined inversion of CSEM towed and ocean-bottom receiver data. Geophysical Journal International, 2018, 214(3): 1701-1714.
Article
Google Scholar
C Ungureanu, A Priceputu, A L Bugea, et al. Use of electric resistivity tomography (ERT) for detecting underground voids on highly anthropized urban construction sites. Procedia Engineering, 2017, 209: 202-209.
Article
Google Scholar
R Putiška, M Nikolaj, I Dostál, et al. Determination of cavities using electrical resistivity tomography. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy, 2012, 42(2): 201-211.
Article
Google Scholar
A Carollo, P Capizzi, R Martorana. Joint interpretation of seismic refraction tomography and electrical resistivity tomography by cluster analysis to detect buried cavities. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2020: 104069.
W Zhang, H Y Xiao, Z C Zhong. Application of high density resistivity method to detecting urban underground water pipelines. Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying, 2009, 37(07): 91-94. (in Chinese)
Google Scholar
S Shin, S Park, J H Kim. Time-lapse electrical resistivity tomography characterization for piping detection in earthen dam model of a sandbox. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 2019, 170: 103834.
G Wu, G Yang, H Tan. Mapping coalmine goaf using transient electromagnetic method and high density resistivity method in Ordos City, China. Geodesy and Geodynamics, 2016, 7(5): 340-347.
Article
Google Scholar
K Phengnaone, R Arjwech, M Everett. 2D electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) method to delineate coal seams: Case studies on lignite and anthracite. Songklanakarin Journal of Science & Technology, 2020, 42(4).
K Shen, M S Selezneva, K A Neusypin. Development of an algorithm for correction of an inertial navigation system in Off-Line mode. Measurement Techniques, 2018, 60(10): 991-997.
Article
Google Scholar
H Sahli. MEMS-based aided inertial navigation system for small diameter pipelines. Canada: University of Calgary, 2016.
Google Scholar
Y Jia, S Li, Y Qin, et al. Error analysis and compensation of MEMS rotation modulation inertial navigation system. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18(5): 2023-2030.
Google Scholar
M S Chowdhury, M F Abdel-Hafez. Pipeline inspection gauge position estimation using inertial measurement unit, odometer, and a set of reference stations. ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part B: Mechanical Engineering, 2016, 2(2): 1-10.
Google Scholar
L W Guan, X D Cong, Q Zhang, et al. A comprehensive review of micro-inertial measurement unit based intelligent pig multi-sensor fusion technologies for small-diameter pipeline surveying. Micromachines, 2020, 11(9): 840.
Article
Google Scholar
P L Hanna. Strapdown inertial systems for pipeline navigation. IEE Colloquium on Inertial Navigation Sensor Development. London, UK, Jan 9-9, 1990: 1-8.
L Guan, Y Gao, H Liu, et al. A review on small-diameter pipeline inspection gauge localization techniques: Problems, methods and challenges. International Conference on Communications, Signal Processing, and their Applications (ICCSPA). Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, March 19-21, 2019: 1-6.
D Sytnyk. Simulation environment for the unexmin underwater robotic exploration system. Institudo Superior de Engenharia do Porto, 2018.
D Hyun, H S Yang, H S Park, et al. Dead-reckoning sensor system and tracking algorithm for 3-D pipeline mapping. Mechatronics, 2010, 20(2): 213-223.
Article
Google Scholar
D H Lee, H Moon, J C Koo, et al. Map building method for urban gas pipelines based on landmark detection. International Journal of Control, 2013, 11(1): 127-135.
Google Scholar
Q Chen, Q Zhang, X Niu, et al. Positioning accuracy of a pipeline surveying system based on MEMS IMU and odometer: Case study. IEEE access, 2019, 7: 104453-104461.
Article
Google Scholar
Q Chen, X Niu, J Kuang, et al. IMU mounting angle calibration for pipeline surveying apparatus. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2019, 69(4): 1765-1774.
Article
Google Scholar
W Abd-Elhamid, A Osman, A Noureldin, et al. Wavelet multi-resolution analysis for enhancing the performance of integrated GPS and MEMS-based navigation systems. Geomatica, 2005, 59(1): 61-72.
Google Scholar
W M F Al-Masri, M F Abdel-Hafez, M A Jaradat. Inertial navigation system of pipeline inspection gauge. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 2018, 28(2): 609-616.
Article
Google Scholar
Z Cui, Q Wang, Q Xue, et al. A review on image reconstruction algorithms for electrical capacitance/resistance tomography. Sensor Review, 2016, 36(4): 429-445.
Article
Google Scholar
P N Darma, M R Baidillah, M W Sifuna, et al. Improvement of image reconstruction in electrical capacitance tomography (ECT) by sectorial sensitivity matrix using a K-means clustering algorithm. Measurement Science and Technology, 2019, 30(7): 075402.
W N Abd Rashid, E J Mohamad, R A Rahim, et al. Design of non- destructive testing on composite material using parallel plate electrical capacitance tomography: a conceptual framework. Jurnal Teknologi, 2017, 79(5-2):1-6.
B J Huber. Capacitive tomography for the location of plastic pipe. Gas Technology Institute (US), 2002:1-55.
B J Huber. Capacitive tomography for the location of plastic pipe. US: Gas Technology Institute, 2002. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/809196
G Guo, G Tong, L Lu, et al. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for the inverse problems in electrical capacitance tomography. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 2018, 64: 204-212.
Article
Google Scholar
J Kryszyn, D M Wanta, W T Smolik. Gain adjustment for signal-to-noise ratio improvement in electrical capacitance tomography system EVT4. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017, 17(24): 8107-8116.
Article
Google Scholar
C Tholin-Chittenden, M Soleimani. Planar array capacitive imaging sensor design optimization. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2017, 17(24): 8059-8071.
Article
Google Scholar
Q Marashdeh, W Warsito, L S Fan, et al. Nonlinear forward problem solution for electrical capacitance tomography using feed-forward neural network. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2006, 6(2): 441-449.
Article
Google Scholar
D J Pasadas, A L Ribeiro, H G Ramos, et al. Automatic parameter selection for Tikhonov regularization in ECT Inverse problem. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 2016, 246: 73-80.
Article
Google Scholar
Z Cao, L Ji, L Xu. Iterative reconstruction algorithm for electrical capacitance tomography based on Calderon’s method. IEEE Sensors Journal, 2018, 18(20): 8450-8462.
Article
Google Scholar
B Inanloo, B Tansel, K Shams, et al. A decision aid GIS-based risk assessment and vulnerability analysis approach for transportation and pipeline networks. Safety Science, 2016, 84: 57-66.
Article
Google Scholar
X Zhang, Y Han, D S Hao, et al. ARGIS-based outdoor underground pipeline information system. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation, 2016, 40: 779-790.
Article
Google Scholar
N F Rezaei, M Karimi, G M Jabari. Qualitative risk assessment of gas pipelines by using of indexing system method in GIS environment. Engineering Journal of Geospatial Information Technology, 2019, 7(1): 91-105.
Article
Google Scholar
M Tulloch, M Chapman. Mapping Ontario’s underground utilities. Ontario Prof Surv, 2005: 24-27.
A Nasirian, M F Maghrebi, S Yazdani. Leakage detection in water distribution network based on a new heuristic genetic algorithm mode. Journal of Water Resource and Protection, 2013, 5(3): 294-303.
Article
Google Scholar
A L Balogun, A N Matori, K Yussof, et al. GIS in pipeline route selection: current trend and challenges, 2013. http://mycoordinates.org/gis-in-pipeline-route-selection/.
A Agapiou, D D Alexakis, K Themistocleous, et al. Water leakage detection using remote sensing, field spectroscopy and GIS in semiarid areas of Cyprus. Urban Water Journal, 2016, 13(3): 221-231.
Article
Google Scholar
S M Ghavami, Z Borzooei, J Maleki. An effective approach for assessing risk of failure in urban sewer pipelines using a combination of GIS and AHP-DEA. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 2020, 133: 275-285.
Article
Google Scholar
G Kennedy, V Ila, R Mahony. A perception pipeline for robotic harvesting of green asparagus. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2019, 52(30): 288-293.
Article
Google Scholar
W Zhao, M Kamezaki, K Yoshida, et al. A coordinated wheeled gas pipeline robot chain system based on visible light relay communication and illuminance assessment. Sensors, 2019, 19(10): 2322.
Article
Google Scholar
J Feder. Smart robotic system tracks buried pipelines, inspects for external damage. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2019, 71(12): 59-62.
Article
Google Scholar
H Song, K Ge, D Qu, et al. Design of in-pipe robot based on inertial positioning and visual detection. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1177/1687814016667679.
H Akbarzadeh, A Bayat. Investigating ASTM F 1962 arching factor for Polyethylene pipes installed by Horizontal Directional Drilling. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2014, 39: 50-57.
Article
Google Scholar
T Zayed, M Mahmoud. Data acquisition and factors impacting productivity of Horizontal Directional Drilling (HDD). Tunnelling and underground Space Technology, 2013, 33: 63-72.
Article
Google Scholar
S A Fjerdingen, P Liljebäck, A A Transeth. A snake-like robot for internal inspection of complex pipe structures (PIKo). 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, St. Louis, MO, USA, Oct. 10-15, 2009: 5665-5671.
F Tâche, W Fischer, G Caprari, et al. Magnebike: A magnetic wheeled robot with high mobility for inspecting complex‐shaped structures. Journal of Field Robotics, 2009, 26(5): 453-476.
Article
Google Scholar
W Fischer, G Caprari, R Siegwart, et al. Foldable magnetic wheeled climbing robot for the inspection of gas turbines and similar environments with very narrow access holes. Industrial Robot: An International Journal, 2010, 37(3): 24-29.
Article
Google Scholar
Q Tu, Q Liu, T Ren, et al. Obstacle crossing and traction performance of active and passive screw pipeline robots. Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2019, 33(5): 2417-2427.
Article
Google Scholar
A Kakogawa, S Ma. Design of a multilink-articulated wheeled pipeline inspection robot using only passive elastic joints. Advanced Robotics, 2018, 32(1): 37-50.
Article
Google Scholar
Y J Qiang, Z Chang, J H Chen. Research on detection method of buried gas PE pipeline in town. East China Cross-Strait Exchange Seminar, Taiwan, China, September 23, 2019: 26-28. (in Chinese)
X R Zhou, H H Chen, J L Li. Mapping the buried pipelines from GPR and GPS data. 2nd International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Management, Changsha, China, December 6-7, 2019: 199-203.
C Q G Muñoz, F P G Marquez, B Lev, et al. New pipe notch detection and location method for short distances employing ultrasonic guided waves. Acta Acustica United with Acustica, 2017, 103(5): 772-781.
Article
Google Scholar
R K Amineh, M Ravan, R Sharma. Nondestructive testing of nonmetallic pipes using wideband microwave measurements. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2020, 68(5): 1763-1772.
Article
Google Scholar
H Wu, M Ravan, R Sharma, et al. Microwave holographic imaging of non-metallic concentric pipes. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 2020: 1-13.
Q Ma, G Tian, Y Zeng, et al. Pipeline in-line inspection method, instrumentation and data management. Sensors, 2021, 21(11): 3862. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/s21113862.
Article
Google Scholar